The 17 worst sequels to great films, ranked
Some movie premises aren't meant to be extended
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Whenever a critically acclaimed movie does well at the box office, Hollywood studios are eager to throw money into a follow-up picture or even a series of sequels.
But some movie premises aren't meant to be extended.
And many, many sequels aren't executed with the thought or care of their far-superior original films, especially in series that have stretched over many years — as one sees in the chasm of quality between The Terminator (1984) and Terminator Genisys (2015).
This ranking selects the films that have a vast discrepancy in Rotten Tomatoes critic scores between their terrible sequels and great originals, and was adapted by Business Insider from their list of the worst sequels of all time.
Here are 17 of the worst sequels to great movies, ranked by the increasing discrepancies in their critical reception:
17. Friday After Next (2002)
Critic score: 26%
Sequel to: Friday (1995) — 74%
Discrepancy: 48%
What critics said: “The jokes are sophomoric, stereotypes are sprinkled everywhere and the acting ranges from bad to bodacious.” — San Francisco Chronicle
16. Batman & Robin
Critic score: 10%
Sequel to: Batman (1989) — 72%
Discrepancy: 62%
What critics said: “A sniggering, exhausting, overproduced extravaganza that has virtually all of the humanity pounded out of it in the name of an endless parade of stunt sequences.” — Chicago Tribune
15. The Fly II (1989)
Critic score: 27%
Sequel to: The Fly (1986) — 91%
Discrepancy: 64%
What critics said: “It's got nothing on Cronenberg's original - or the Vincent Price classic” — Sunday Times
14. Rocky V (1990)
Critic score: 28%
Sequel to: Rocky (1976) — 93%
Discrepancy: 65%
What critics said: “Whereas the first and far superior Rocky had real heart, this tries and fails to have brains.” — Time Out
13. Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977)
Critic score: 19%
Sequel to: The Exorcist (1973) — 86%
Discrepancy: 67%
What critics said: “An often astonishingly terrible and inept sequel.” — Reel Film Reviews
12. Poltergeist III (1988)
Critic score: 18%
Sequel to: Poltergeist (1982) — 86%
Discrepancy: 68%
What critics said: “Falls right in line with its entirely underwhelming predecessor.” — Reel Film Reviews
11. Caddyshack II (1988)
Critic score: 4%
Sequel to: Caddyshack (1980) — 75%
Discrepancy: 71%
What critics said: “The kind of film that sends careers spiraling downward.” — The New York Times
10. S. Darko: A Donnie Darko Tale (2009)
Critic score: 13%
Sequel to: Donnie Darko (2001) — 86%
Discrepancy: 73%
What critics said: “A thick, viscous sludge of clichés, stereotypes, and poorly written dialogue.” — FilmCritic.com
9. Terminator Genisys (2015)
Critic score: 26%
Sequel to: The Terminator (1984) — 100%
Discrepancy: 74%
What critics said: “It is mechanical in the worst way.” — Minneapolis Star-Tribune
8. Little Fockers (2010)
Critic score: 9%
Sequel to: Meet the Parents (2000) — 84%
Discrepancy: 75%
What critics said: “It may be time to try another household for laughs.” — Entertainment Weekly
7. Crocodile Dundee in Los Angeles (2001)
Critic score: 11%
Sequel to: Crocodile Dundee (1986) — 87%
Discrepancy: 76%
What critics said: “I've seen audits that were more thrilling.” — Chicago Sun-Times
6. A Good Day to Die Hard (2013)
Critic score: 14%
Sequel to: Die Hard (1988) — 93%
Discrepancy: 79%
What critics said: “This is the fifth and least of the Die Hard movies.” — Grantland
5. The Next Karate Kid (1994)
Critic score: 7%
Sequel to: The Karate Kid (1984) — 88%
Discrepancy: 81%
What critics said: “The franchise is still kicking — but not very high.” — Variety
4. Staying Alive (1983)
Critic score: 0%
Sequel to: Saturday Night Fever (1977) — 85%
Discrepancy: 85%
What critics said: “A sequel with no understanding of what made its predecessor work.” — The New York Times
3. Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)
Critic score: 3%
Sequel to: Speed (1994) — 93%
Discrepancy: 90%
What critics said: “Frantic action, tinny dialogue, perfunctory characterization and tried-and-false plot pilferings.” — The Wall Street Journal
2. The Sting II (1983)
Critic score: 0%
Sequel to: The Sting (1973) — 93%
Discrepancy: 93%
What critics said: “A clumsy counterfeit that is a real-life con game involving the ticket buyer.” — People
1. Jaws: The Revenge (1987)
Critic score: 0%
Sequel to: Jaws (1975) — 97%
Discrepancy: 97%
What critics said: “Dumb beyond belief, hollow, bloody and nonsensical.” — LA Times
Read more:
• How much the best paid workers in 20 professions earn
• Seven outdated men’s style ‘rules’ that you can now ignore
• 16 skills that are hard to learn but will pay off forever
Read the original article on Business Insider UK. © 2018. Follow Business Insider UK on Twitter.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments