Words: Obscene

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 15 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JAMES FERMAN, the outgoing film censor, seems to have got his knickers in a twist over the difference between pornography and obscenity, or rather about the point at which the one becomes the other, since the first embraces the second. "We are left", he has said, "with a flourishing black market which mixes pornography with obscenity." There's a semantic problem here. You could look at it by saying that if people take pleasure in it it's only pornography, but if they are disgusted by it then it must be obscene, but this is not much help towards a definition, obscenity being in the eye of the beholder.

The etymologists are not too clear about it either. William Smith, the great Latinist thought that obscaenus might have come from caenum, which meant dirt, with the ob- as a sort of intensifier, but Oxford says "of doubtful etymology", perhaps worried about that intrusive "s". In English, people often used to say something was obscene when all they meant was that it was grubby or unwashed: one might speak of an obscene dog, or an obscene beggar, whose only sin was that he had no access to a pump. This supports Sir William Smith's theory. Even as late as the 1920s we have Arnold Bennett writing about a run-down part of town where "the areas [he meant the basement areas of the houses], except one or two, were obscene".

We have forgotten that side of it now. The filth we talk about is all metaphorical filth the sort of thing which, in the familiar words of the Obscene Publications Acts, "tends to deprave or corrupt". In the 1950s, if you asked anyone what the word meant, they would tend to lie back and think of Lady Chatterley.

Since then a curious thing has happened. Obscene, having concentrated its meaning, has expanded it again. I'm not sure when this began to happen, perhaps in the mid 1960s. Anything with which the speaker disagrees strongly enough can now be described as obscene - the income of a fat-cat, the prodigality of a town hall, the destruction of wildlife site, a prisoner's early release. The legal meaning, with the unpleasant image evoked by it, has given new life to the metaphor.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in