TELEVISION / The good and faithful domestic servant

Thomas Sutcliffe
Tuesday 12 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I SEEM to remember a Spitting Image sketch in which a rubbery version of Sir John Gielgud intoned poetry while someone poked at him from the wings with a broomstick. It was a running joke - on would come the wobbly Sir John, voice tremulous with diction, and then an unseen hand would attempt to stem the flow or to hook him off-screen. The sketch did not appear in Omnibus's (BBC 1) mostly reverential trot through Gielgud's nine decades in the theatre, though they did acknowledge, in a more formal way, that his particular verbal panache had fallen out of fashion. More interestingly, Gielgud himself recognised the dangerous perishability of any acting style. Listening to an early recording of himself, he observed, with nice diplomacy, that 'it sounds to me very voice-conscious'.

This was good mannered of him. Modesty can be a very self-advertising virtue but Gielgud's here was the real thing - an unfussy observation that, for an actor, a recorded performance can only hope to preserve what we least want preserved - the manners of the time. Gielgud had opened the programme with a little speech (like others in the programme it sounded written out rather than spontaneous) in which he confessed to his envy of painters and writers: 'I have often thought how happy they must be to do their work in private, at home, unkempt and unobserved, able to destroy, or renew or improve their creations at will.'

I doubt if the ability to pick your nose as you work is really what animates him here - it is the fact that paintings and novels, if they last, mature with age. Theatrical genius, on the other hand, is a flower which begins to dry and discolour as soon as the curtain drops. Indeed, one of the cruelties of the stage is that your best shot at immortality lies in the hands of your critics - a fact that video and film haven't really done much to change. 'To see him act,' said Coleridge of Edmund Kean, 'is like reading Shakespeare by flashes of lightning.' But if we had film of Kean acting we probably wouldn't know where to look for embarrassment.

So, as unsatisfactory as it was, Omnibus probably offered the best you could get - recollections of distinguished fans (John Mortimer, Harold Pinter and Peter Hall among others) and a familiar gush from theatrical colleagues. These were evidence for an actor of exceptional decorum and verbal precision, a man who used his star status to bring Shakespeare into the West End. His style was described as Romantic by several speakers but it appeared quite the opposite in the clips and recordings here - which showed a senatorial presence who seemed to have disciplined the passions by means of diction. 'He's probably best known now for his quintessential English screen performances, like the butler in Arthur,' said Kenneth Branagh at the beginning of the programme. This didn't exactly sound promising as an epitaph for a great Shakespearian actor - but it contained an element of truth. Where some celebrated actors are house guests from hell, all temperament and bad habits, Gielgud is the perfect domestic servant - bearing the text before him with exemplary carriage and never spilling a drop.

'Living in a Boom Time' (40 Minutes, BBC 2) looked like a DIY documentary, filmed on a home-video and narrated with undisguised passion. I think this rather misses the point of camcorders, which is surely to give people the opportunity to present their own lives (with all the artifice that involves) rather than just allow for one-man film crews. But, that apart, Michael Darlow's film was a useful reminder of the distress and anxiety faced by the 1000 families every week whose homes are repossessed. Both families here were victims of the Right to Buy, a nationwide con-trick that has probably caused more distress than timeshare salesmen. 'I think that's what we've got to do - go for broke,' said one man, surrendering the battle to save his home, and his transformation of an entrepreneurial rallying cry into a literal description was a little piece of political history in itself.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in