Last Night: The Apprentice, BBC1

Lord Sugar's new apprentice proves nice guys don't always lose

Tom Sutcliffe
Sunday 17 July 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments
(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nice guys, it seems, don't always finish last – even when they've finished last quite a lot. Tom Pellereau, by common consent the most likeable of this year's Apprentice contestants, had also been on the losing team more often than any of the other three finalists – eight times in total.

Given the filming methods it's possible that he spent more time in the boardroom this series than Lord Sugar himself. But, as 11 weeks of applied incompetence and retrospective buck-passing came to an end last night, it was Tom who won out – securing a partnership with Lord Sugar and a £250,000 investment in his new business.

And while Helen Milligan may have left the process feeling that she'd crashed into the last hurdle in a race she was leading by a length, it wasn't a victory by default. "I didn't know you had it in you, Tom. I didn't know you had it in you", Sugar said with what looked like genuinely gratified surprise, after Pellereau had explained how he doorstepped one of his inventions on to the shelves of Wal-mart. It was one of the last things Tom said, and it appeared to clinch the win for him.

There was no task in this final episode and no reappearance by previous losers. The only thing the contestants had to do was make their business plans convincing and survive the ordeal by insult handed out by Lord Sugar's hired character assassins.

"Would you be prepared to say, Tom, that your career is floundering?" asked Claude Littler, a question which counted in this context as a friendly ice-breaker.

Meanwhile Margaret Mountford was trying to stem the blarney spill of Jim Eastwood's self-belief. Tell me about yourself, she said and "try and say it without clichés and say it very quickly". "I'm exactly what it says on the tin", Jim snapped back obligingly. Helen, identified as something of corporate android by one of the interrogators, was challenged to show her human side by telling a joke. "Can I come back to that later?" she asked, startled.

Claude did for Susan too – dissecting her fairy-tale profit projections so clinically that she was shocked into telling the truth about how bad it had been.

Helen, feeling the water reaching her waist – "I cannot express my disappointment in your business plan," Lord Sugar told her – desperately tried to make it into a lifeboat, abandoning her original notion in favour of a chain of bakery stores. But it was too late. Within Tom's complicated plan, Lord Sugar had spotted a simpler one – to design a better office chair and sell it for more than it costs to make. Nice guy, you're hired.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in