Broadmoor, TV review: A problematic insight into the notorious psychiatric hospital

It has taken five years for the high-security institution to allow cameras in

Sally Newall
Wednesday 05 November 2014 20:00 EST
Comments
History of violence: the high-security psychiatric hospital Broadmoor
History of violence: the high-security psychiatric hospital Broadmoor (ITV)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Broadmoor in the public imagination is a place of Hallowe'en-worthy horror. Some of the country's most notorious criminals are housed at the high-security psychiatric hospital, including Yorkshire Ripper Peter Sutcliffe, found guilty of murdering 13 women, and serial killer Kenneth Erskine, the Stockwell Strangler. But as we saw in Broadmoor (ITV) a grimly informative, but not hugely revealing, documentary, in reality it's a more diverse, prosaic institution.

It took a five-year battle to allow cameras in to film inmates for the first time. As such, the two-part series had already made headlines with the more extreme details – six staff guarding the most violent patients; an average of five physical assaults a week – taking the edge off the promised "secrets revealed".

Problematic too was the necessary protection of patients' identities. Faces were blurred and details of crimes held back. What was fresh was the patients' openness: we met "Frank", a violent offender who described how a task chopping a fruit salad left him fighting the urge to attack. He resisted. "What an achievement. A year ago, most likely I would have done it," he told the camera.

There was "Daniel", an articulate 24-year-old who sat on his bed in an "assertive rehabilitation" ward, surrounded by science books and walls plastered with skilled charcoal portraits. He could have been mistaken for a university student. "I've been grateful to come here," he said. We were told 10 years ago he was convicted of a violent crime against his own family.

When the patients became unreliable story-tellers, we had psychiatrists and other staff. Yes, there was bleak detail – like the showing of a cupboard of self-styled weapons including sharpened plastic spoons – but the focus was on patients' progress and rehabilitation.

Cameras were ushered out twice. Once when a violent inmate resisting return to his room was escorted by nine staff who raced from the space like zoo-keepers fleeing a wild cat. That wasn't uncommon, we were told, as blood was mopped up.

This seemed to be the version of Broadmoor that Broadmoor wanted us to see. Perhaps to expect anything else is, like the common portrayal of the institution, unrealistic.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in