And Then There Were None, BBC1 - TV review: Not so much a whodunit as an examination of guilt

Five became four, then three, then two, and our nerves became frayed

Sarah Hughes
Monday 28 December 2015 19:00 EST
Comments
And Then There Were None
And Then There Were None (BBC)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Christmas viewing wouldn't be complete without a piece of quality drama amid the soaps, movies and comforting specials. This year the honours fell to Sarah Phelps' smart, sharp adaptation of Agatha Christie's greatest novel, And Then There Were None, which came to its riveting conclusion last night as tensions continued to rise on Soldier Island and five became four, then three and, finally, two.

Phelps drew early criticism for supposedly sexing up Christie (and certainly it's hard not to wonder if it's written into Aidan “Poldark” Turner's contract that he must appear fetchingly half naked for at least one episode of each show that he's in) but such complaints were minor in the face of a hugely atmospheric take on this clever but tricksy tale.

It helped that Phelps had an all-star cast to draw on ensuring that it was never easy to guess who the killer might be. Was it Turner's sardonic soldier of war? Maeve Dermody's guilt-ridden governess? Charles Dance's kindly but cold-hearted judge? Toby Stephens' belligerent, booze-sodden doctor? Burn Gorman's cocky spiv of a cop? As the night wore on so another suspect was ruled out of contention and the puzzle became ever more fiendish. Was Turner's Philip Lombard right that some one else was pulling the strings? Which of the survivors was lying? In fact were any of them telling the truth? And, most importantly, who if anyone would make it out alive?

By the time the endgame arrived audiences watching at home were living on their fraying nerves just as much as the paranoid inhabitants of Soldier Island. I won't spoil the ending for those who have yet to catch up except to say that the identity of the murderer was both well signalled and made perfect sense, despite a certain amount of sleight of hand on Christie's part.

Yet, ingenious as the ultimate puzzle was (and it is one of Christie's best), And Then There Were None owes its reputation to the fact that its not so much a whodunit as an examination of guilt and the possibly (or lack thereof) of redemption. Phelps, who made her name on EastEnders, clearly understood this, placing Dermody's grief-haunted Vera centre stage to great effect and asking which is worse: to pretend to feel guilt for something you did as a way of living with yourself or to cheerfully admit that you are a killer and feel no guilt at all?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in