Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Reality TV contestants reveal how ‘real’ the shows actually were

'In reality, the houses you see you aren't even considering for purchase, as you have already purchased the house you 'buy' at the end of the show.'

Christopher Hooton
Tuesday 26 January 2016 05:43 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There (hopefully) aren’t many viewers left who take reality shows at face value, but exactly what is real and what is artifice is hard to get a handle on.

The issue was tossed out on Reddit this week for crowdsourced responses from people who have actually featured on the shows, and several came forward.

Their accounts perhaps aren’t surprising (Judge Judy cases are decided before the cameras have even started rolling, who’d have thought?!) but they are intriguing, suggesting that in many cases ‘Reconstruction TV’ would be a better term for the genre than ‘Reality TV’.

Judge Judy

Mistyranch

I was on Judge Judy back in 2010.

Our case was real and hand-picked by the the production team. We had to pull the case from real court in order to go on her show.

The decision of who "wins and loses" is made up before you even walk into the courtroom set. The audience is all actors paid to sit there. Judge was wearing jeans and slippers under her robe. Also, she's incredibly quiet in real life. As in, I had to really strain to hear her.

All in all, I got a paid three day vacation to LA and stayed in a decent hotel. I also got paid to be on the show AND when I "lost" they show paid the other guy for me.

Pretty amazing, really.

SleepyBojazzles

Was Judge Judy nicer than she is on the show?

Mistyranch

No, not really.

Because of the nature of the show, she was intentionally meaner to me as I was the "loser." I also ran with it and bantered with her/argued in true CourtroomTV fashion, so take that as you will.

You don't really get a chance to talk to her other than in the acting-setting. She only comes into the room after the cameras roll and she leaves before you.

DrSandbags

So that's why people sometimes get an attitude with her even though she makes the decision? The outcome is already decided in advance.

Mistyranch

Pretty much. I'm not argumentative at all IRL. But the producer explained to me to "hold my ground" and make sure to play it up.

So, I did just that. Gave her hell and enjoyed every second of it, haha

House Hunters

Where-am-I-at

I was on an episode House Hunters ... it's reality television, so it's pretty made up and scripted. They try to make the show like a 'recreation' of you buying a home.

In reality, the houses you see you aren't even considering for purchase, as you have already purchased the house you 'buy' at the end of the show. In fact, they only approach you to film the show if you are either in escrow or later, so that they don't have a bunch of fakers on the program.

They play off your personality, so when you are 'considering' the other homes, and even when talking about your own home on camera, you have to say things like "oh I really like the fact that it has a pool"... then the director will say CUT, and he will give you direction to say something like "uhh... I just HATE pools, they are so much maintenance"... essentially they want positive and negative about every little thing, so that the production studios back in NYC can piece together whatever story is most compelling.

You have to remember nothing in Hollywood is real, but HH does a pretty good job of creating the actual experience so that you can compare your lifestyle to others, compare money, etc. Overall was pretty fun. Took about 1.5 weeks to film a 22 minute episode.

What Not To Wear

BrotherofAllfather

I was on What not to Wear - AMA. :) I will say the hours were really long and they don't make you throw everything away. Also Clinton Kelly was one of the nicest people I have ever met. Went above and beyond to help me get clothes that worked, even staying on off camera at the 15th hour of a day to get the right pants. Stacy was nice too.

The weirdest things were the up close re-shoots. if you pointed at anything while being filmed, they'd come in afterward and do an up close of your hand doing the motion. We learned towards the end to just stop pointing.

Ninja Warrior

DecentDudeDustin

I was on American Ninja Warrior. All in all, it's legit.

The crowd reactions are often from different runs/times, the crowd noise may be doctored here and there, the order of the runs may be changed, and the commentary may be re-dubbed, but that's all minor TV-stuff that's expected.

Everyone that worked on the show was incredibly nice. It's clearly a TV show more than a pure athletic competition, but that doesn't detract from it in anyway, in my opinion.

10/10, would keep watching.

So, yes, at the beginning the hosts get some TV footage of great reactions from the crowd with no one actually running the course. Then people run the course as normal. I didn't find it that weird at all, especially knowing how cut-and-paste TV footage is for this sort of thing.

When it starts to get around 3AM, the crowd doesn't care what's going on at all. You can start to see the crowd just get tired and lose interest, so they need shots to throw in those spans. That is where it does seem more necessary, although I suppose they could also get more genuine shots at the beginning when the crowd is still energetic.

Survivor

survivor-contestant

Throwaway and probably too late for anybody to see this. I was a contestant on Survivor: Pearl Islands. For the most part nothing is really scripted, although obviously it's cut way out of order for dramatic effect (I learned you can always tell by the pimples that appear and disappear on contestants from scene to scene).

Some people are surprised that we were provided toilet paper and tampons plus a spot to shit and throw away the paper. Which was good because most people had to get up to blast a diarrhea dump at least three times a day from eating rice cooked in stagnant filth water. No matter how much they boiled that water it still tasted earthy and had grains of dirt in it.

mad_morrigan

If this thread has taught me anything, it's that reality shows like to edit shit...lol. Do you still watch the show? Is the NDA as hardass as they portray? Was the experience as difficult as you imagined? I have so many questions....!

survivor-contestant

NDA is tight as hell, I'm probably in violation talking about the tampon stuff hence the throwaway. I do still watch. And the experience was not too difficult and was about what I imagined. There seemed to be two types of people out there, the ones who had no idea what being outdoors was going to be like and then those of us who had done some camping and were used to it somewhat. And just that thrill of knowing "holy shit i'm on survivor" seems enough to sustain a lot of us. Single most underrated challenge has to be getting up the energy to do physical challenges when you haven't eaten or slept. Doing the challenges felt like being in a hypnotic daze where your body was just willing itself on but your mind was completely gone like in a half dream state. Closest thing I can compare it to is that feeling of taking a tough exam after an all nighter, and the way you CAN function but your brain feels outside of your body?

Mythbusters

normanlee448

It's not exactly billed as a reality show, but I was on Mythbusters! Proof (the one in the gray on the very right)

They had a survey linked on their Facebook page for you to be a volunteer. It asked a bunch of seemingly random questions, I guess to make sure they got a good spread of people across a wide variety of different myths to test. I signed up, got an email saying that it would be in some industrial part of San Francisco, and then another email saying it had been canceled. A few days after that, I got another email offering a different position, this time at 10 in the morning in a nightclub, with business casual clothing specified. No information about what the myth actually is.

I show up at the nightclub and I'm waiting around for about an hour or so before things actually happen. In the meantime, other volunteers show up, and it's all dudes. I think to myself that it's just the sort of demographic that would want to sign up for a Mythbusters myth, or because this is the bay area (a lot of them also happened to be engineers), but once somebody comes over and directs us to the restaurant next door, I see girls seated at little tables around the room and realize that it's a speed dating myth and they were keeping the guys and girls separate.

When we go in, the director or some guy tells us what's going to happen, what Jamie's going to say, and then we have to step out of the restaurant so we can step back in while the cameras are rolling. We go in, Jamie and Adam have a bit of a rehearsed intro, and then Jamie messes up and we have to go out and back in again so he can redo it.

Once that's all done, we get down to the "mock" speed dating (essentially real speed dating, just that no actual exchange of contact info occurs), and I have a few awkward conversations with the girls. The awkwardness was compounded by the fact that there was a camera three feet to my right that I had to avoid looking at while trying to hold a conversation. At one point, after filling out my little rating card, the camera guy asks me to act as if I'm filling it out again, so he can get a close-up shot.

I should note that, although there was the bit at the beginning where Jamie and Adam talk, we were never explicitly told what the myth was. I did notice some of the girls' hair looked a little weird, though, and when we were taken back to the nightclub afterward for the debriefing, the guys concluded that it must have had something to do with testing hair color. We then had individual exit interviews, we took the group picture that you see above, and then I was on my way.

There was a separate set of people in the afternoon, and they mixed both groups' footage for the show, so I barely even show up; the clearest shot of me is of my back as the camera is focused on the girl I'm talking to.

Edit: For the people asking which episode it was, it was Laws of Attraction. The volunteer opportunity was in August 2013, so it took a whole year to air; sometimes they sit on the myths for a while.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in