Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Police to watch controversial Channel 4 documentary Benefits Street to investigate crime

 

Lizzie Dearden
Tuesday 07 January 2014 09:55 EST
Dee Roberts, 32, featured on Benefits Street on Monday Night
Dee Roberts, 32, featured on Benefits Street on Monday Night (Channel 4)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Police officers will be watching Channel 4 reality show Benefits Street to investigate crime after bring “inundated” with messages from concerned viewers.

The first episode of the show aired yesterday evening, featuring shoplifters and thieves among the residents of James Turner Street in Birmingham.

It appeared to show a number of people breaking the law with benefit fraud and drug taking.

Superintendent Danny Long, from Birmingham Police, said: “Throughout the programme and in the hours that have followed, we have been inundated with comments from members of the public, many of whom are concerned about elements of the show which showed criminal activity.

“We are currently assessing whether the content of the programme can assist us as part of any ongoing investigations or indeed whether any new inquiries should be launched in light of the material that has been broadcast.”

He described the Winson Green area as “a diverse and vibrant community”, where the local policing team had a good relationship with residents.

Benefits Street provoked controversy even before it aired, with a number of contributors claiming they were misrepresented.

Featured resident Dee Roberts told the Birmingham Mail she participated because producers told her the series would depict community spirit and neighbourliness.

She added: “But this programme has nothing to do with community, which you can tell from the title.

“It’s all about people in the street living off benefits, taking drugs and dossing around all day. It makes people out as complete scum.”

Dee predicted the response from many of the programme’s viewers, who flooded Twitter with abusive messages and even death threats.

One user wrote: “Put big gates at the ends of #benefitsstreet lock them and set the f***ing lot on fire! Save us workers some money on tax! #Tramps”

Another tweeted: “Pure scum bags [sic]!!!! Shoot the lot of erm [sic]!!! My hard earned tax money wasted on these absolute a***holes!!!”

But others leapt to the defence of residents, criticising the show’s producers instead.

One person wrote: “They're calling for people you exploited to die, @LoveProdHouse @Channel4. Was it worth the ratings?”

A Channel 4 spokesman called the documentary a "fair reflection of the reality of life on a street where the majority of households receive benefits".

He said: “The contributors were briefed extensively before any filming took place. If any residents requested not to be filmed they were not.

“The main contributors have been offered the opportunity to view the programmes they feature in before transmission to make any comments about their contributions."

The spokesman said the production crew were filming in "a purely observational capacity" and criminal behaviour was not encouraged or condoned.

He added: "All contributors were briefed that if they carried out criminal activity on camera this could result in criminal investigations after broadcast."

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in