David Walliams and Martin Clunes among celebrities to settle phone hacking claims
Walliams’s lawyer said he ‘suffered distress and embarrassment as a result of the misuse of his private information’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Walliams and Martin Clunes are among a number of celebrities to have formally settled damages claims over phone hacking against a newspaper publisher at the High Court.
The Britain’s Got Talent judge and Doc Martin actor have received “substantial compensation” and a public apology after bringing legal action against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), which publishes The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and The People.
Their cases were formally settled at a hearing on Thursday (25 February) alongside claims by Roxanne Pallett, Antony Cotton, Mark and Samantha Womack, Caroline Quentin and her husband Sam Farmer.
Mr Justice Mann heard Walliams had alleged he was targeted by MGN between 2003 and 2010, and that his friends and colleagues were also targeted to obtain private information, with 45 articles published as a result of intercepted voicemails or other unlawful techniques.
In 2018, MGN admitted liability for misuse of private information by intercepting voicemails in 2004 and other unlawful information techniques between 2004 and 2006, also admitting that two of the 45 articles were produced by unlawful information gathering.
Read more - David Walliams criticised after old video shows him pulling down boy’s trousers on stage
The court heard the Little Britain star was “extremely upset” to learn about this due to his working relationship with the publishing group on projects including Pride of Britain and Comic Relief.
Roddy Chisholm Batten, representing Walliams, told the court: “Mr Walliams is also upset and angered by the lengths to which MGN went in order to invade his private life.
“He suffered distress and embarrassment as a result of the misuse of his private information. By intercepting his voicemails, MGN would have been privy to messages of a highly personal nature.
“Many articles identified by Mr Walliams were highly intrusive and were published at a time of intense media intrusion into his life.
“This had a very significant impact on both his personal life and his professional life. Many relationships were damaged or destroyed as a result of MGN’s conduct and this is a source of huge regret to Mr Walliams.”
Read more - Piers Morgan calls David Walliams a ‘treacherous piece of work’ amid Britain’s Got Talent feud
In October 2020, both sides agreed to settle Walliams’s claim, with MGN admitting liability, paying substantial compensation and paying his reasonable legal costs.
The newspaper publisher accepted the methods should not have been employed and also apologised privately to the actor.
Hannah Gornall, representing Clunes - whose real name is Alexander Clunes - said: “The claimant claimed that his voicemail messages were hacked into by MGN’s journalists. As a result, these journalists would have been privy to personal messages left on his phone, or left by him for others such as family and friends.
“In November 2020 the parties reached an agreement to resolve the claimant’s claim.
“As part of that agreement the defendant agreed to provide an undertaking not to intercept the claimant’s voicemail messages, pay compensation to the claimant and join in this statement to apologise to the claimant for the misuse of his private information.”
Additional reporting by PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments