Benefits Street: Ratings rise again as record 5.2m tune in to third episode
The show has added almost 1m viewers since the first episode two weeks ago
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Ratings for the controversial Channel 4 show Benefits Street grew again last night as 5.2 million viewers tuned in to watch the programme.
The documentary, which has sparked a police probe and a campaign urging Channel 4 to drop the show, is the channel's most successful show in over a year.
The first episode attracted 4.3 million viewers when it debuted earlier this month.
Last night’s third episode added a further 200,000 viewers to the second episode after five million tuned in to watch the programme last Monday.
The show, which has been branded “poverty porn”, has been attacked for its negative and stereotypical portrayal of people on benefits.
An online petition urging the broadcaster to axe the programme has received more than 55,000 signatures, claiming that the show does not honestly portray the residents who live in James Turner Street in Birmingham.
Arshad Mahmood, a former Birmingham bus driver who started the petition, states on the change.org website: “Benefits Street has portrayed people on benefits as scroungers and it’s wrong. The backlash and abuse of social networks towards people on benefits as a result of this show has shocked me.
“Channel 4 should not broadcast any further episodes of the programme – it is creating a skewed image of a section of society and stirring up hatred.”
A police probe was launched after the first episode of Benefits Street when a number of Twitter users made death threats towards the residents seen on the show.
Channel 4 has defended the show, calling it a “fair and balanced observational documentary series”, but the programme has provoked a nationwide debate about the media’s portrayal of people on benefits.
Writing in The Independent, Owen Jones said Channel 4 had a greater responsibility to portray welfare claimants more accurately.
“This dross has left the public woefully ill-informed,” he said. “The public is not aware that most social security spending is, rightly, spent on pensioners who have paid in all their lives; or that the Government’s freeze on benefits mostly hits working people.”
Read more
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments