BBC watchdog rules in favour of Woman’s Hour after man complains of sexism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The BBC Trust has ruled that Woman’s Hour on Radio 4 is not sexist after it was accused of displaying unfairness to men over several years.
The corporation’s watchdog responded to a complaint from human sociality writer and researcher Steve Moxon whose work was discussed on the programme in December 2012.
Mr Moxon called it "a blot on the BBC" and complained that “Woman’s Hour had over many years displayed unfairness to men”.
He said he had been deliberately misrepresented by Women’s Hour presenter Jane Garvey who interviewed MP Ann McKechin during a programme about a report by Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee entitled Women in the Workplace.
In conversation with the MP Mrs Garvey said Mr Moxon had “made some pretty controversial comments about woman relatively recently, and indeed he told you that he didn’t think that women were capable of being bosses”.
Mr Moxon’s complaint said that he did not describe himself as an academic, as Mrs Garvey suggested, but as a cross-disciplinary researcher/writer on human sociality with regard to the sexes. He said his remarks were meant to address why women only represent a small proportion of those “at the top” and he had not argued that women were incapable of being bosses.
He said that the interview “had not been set up in an impartial way” and also complained that Woman’s Hour had over the years dismissed science research on men and women.
The BBC Trust upheld that while the interviewer’s description of Mr Moxon as “a man who describes himself as an academic” was inaccurate and a breach of its guidelines on fairness, there was no evidence of bias.
It dismissed all four other complaints.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments