Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Baby Reindeer’s ‘real-life Martha’ is owed an apology, claims TV consultant

Fiona Harvey is suing Netflix for £132 million following the show

Emma Guinness
Monday 08 July 2024 08:13 EDT
Comments
'Get a job': 'Real' Martha sends message to Richard Gadd over Baby Reindeer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The woman who allegedly inspired Netflix’s hit series Baby Reindeer should be owed an apology from the streaming service, a consultant to Ofcom has claimed.

Fiona Harvey, 58, was quickly tracked down by internet sleuths after the show – which is based around an aspiring comedian’s experience with a stalker – said it was based on a true story.

Ms Harvey is now suing Netflix for $170m (£132m) over the series written by comedian Richard Gadd, 35.

Consultant to Ofcom, Duane Dedman, told the Royal Television Society (RTS) last week: “On Baby Reindeer, the short answer is I have no idea how Netflix can justify saying this is a true story and then at the end of the end credits say something like, some scenes were fictionalised and the characters conflated.

“That’s obviously seen as contradictory and we shall see if the court case in America ever goes to trial or whether they settle out of court.”

Fiona Harvey compared to Jessica Gunning on ‘Baby Reindeer’
Fiona Harvey compared to Jessica Gunning on ‘Baby Reindeer’ (Talk/Netflix)

While Ms Harvey told the media she believed she was the inspiration for the character, she took umbrage with several details in the show, including the claim that she had been to prison when she had not.

The show seemed to suggest that she sexually assaulted Mr Gadd, which she also says is untrue.

The character of Martha also appeared to share several qualities with Ms Harvey, including the fact she was Scottish, a reported lawyer, and notably older than Mr Gadd’s character.

Ms Harvey, originally from Fyvie in Aberdeenshire, also frequented a London pub where Mr Gadd used to work, The Hawley Arms in Camden.

While she admitted to Piers Morgan that she had met the comedian from Fife on several occasions, she denied many aspects of the show, including the claim that she sent him 41,000 emails.

Ms Harvey appeared in an interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored to tell her side of the story
Ms Harvey appeared in an interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored to tell her side of the story (PA Media)

In an interview on Piers Morgan Uncensored, she said she believes Mr Gadd got the idea to transform her character into a stalker because she had previously been accused of similar offences, and Mr Gadd was aware of this.

The television consultant added: “Personally, arguably, yes [Netflix owes Ms Harvey an apology] but I guess this will play out in the courts.

“And I guess Netflix are deliberately being tight-lipped about this because perhaps they have a robust case to rebut her claims.

“Now, all I know about Netflix is there are a team of lawyers there, there is a compliance team there, so someone, more than once will have cast their eyes over the script and the final programme.

“I literally can’t second guess as to why they came to that decision, so I don’t want to go there, but I guess this will play out.”

Ms Harvey claims the show’s alleged inability to protect her identity resulted in defamation, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violations of the right of publicity.

The case, which was filed by Ms Harvey in a California court last month, remains ongoing.

A Netflix spokesperson said: “We intend to defend this matter vigorously and to stand by Richard Gadd’s right to tell his story.”

The Independent has reached out to Netflix for further comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in