Being Modern: TV-show hashtags

Robert Epstein
Saturday 16 February 2013 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Do TV viewers want a synchronous interactive experience? Yes they do. So Twitter has advised TV producers, anyway. I'll give you a second to work out what the heck that means… aaaaaaand, we're back. Are we back? You betcha, and we're back with a hashtag! Oh, #forgoodnesssake.

Because nothing says the ads are over like an ident with a hashtag plastered all over it. It's not enough that producers ask us to tune in nowadays; we have to be tuned in, too – enough to make "witty" remarks about whatever we've just seen.

Coming up next weekend is one of the big hitters of the TV Twitter schedule, the Oscars. Watch out for the appearance of "madlibs" – allegedly spontaneous hashtags that pop up on screen, such as #whatISgagawearing, in a bid to get them trending. Yep, they're bound to whizz you right through that four-and-a-half-hour snoozeathon.

Of course, interacting with television shows isn't entirely new – only, in the past, there's usually been a solid reason behind it. To complain (Points of View); to offer a collection of bubblegum cards in exchange for a bike (Swap Shop); or to be humiliated (Noel's House Party). In other words, viewers actually affected what was taking place on screen.

Now, instead, we're endlessly encouraged to expel mind-farts into the digital abyss, like a frothy-mouthed clump of am-dram Lears who have nothing left to live for other than the vain hope that a continuity announcer will chucklingly reveal to the nation what we've been saying. #seriouslyguys.

Some might say that's not so very different from the way people use Twitter every day, as we wait for others to validate us by "favouriting" (ugh) our musings. But as soon as the activity becomes less ethereal, as soon as it's grounded in commerciality and notions of brand-building, it loses its sense of free-wheeling merriment. Don't tell us what to tweet about, please: we're perfectly able to concoct our own ridiculous topics. So, who's up for a game of #namingfamousBernards? Go on, I'll begin. Cribbins…

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in