Theatre The Thickness of Skin Royal Court Upstairs, London

Paul Taylor
Thursday 04 April 1996 17:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

You would have to be very thick-skinned indeed not to wince with recognition during Clare McIntyre's The Thickness of Skin. Premiered now in Hettie Macdonald's beautifully acted production, it's this author's first play in six years and it quickly establishes itself as the most searching look at the problems, perils and mixed motives attendant on offering help to the unfortunate since David Hare's The Secret Rapture (1988).

Well-heeled Michael (Rupert Frazer) thinks that simply because he pays income tax he's entitled to an exemption from considering the needs of people whose lives are in a mess. His like-minded wife Roanna (Elizabeth Garvie) is duly appalled when she discovers that their 17-year-old son (Toby Ross-Bryant) has been doing good turns for the unkempt, scene-creating schizophrenic woman (Maggie McCarthy) who has a bedsit in the house next door. "Never, never get involved with somebody like that," Roanna snaps. "You don't know where it's going to end."

It is Michael's schoolteacher sister, Laura, whose painful experience might seem to bear out this ruling, although the play implies that things needn't have been so bad if she could have acknowledged from the start that pure altruism is often an illusion and that, in the relationship between benefactor and recipient, it can be extremely tricky deciding who is using whom.

Quite against the rules of the day centre for homeless people where she does voluntary work, Laura has taken in one of its clients. It's no great obstacle to this act of charity that Eddie (Mark Strong), an out-of-work northern carpenter, happens to be a sexy bit of rough, or that Laura is a lonely, thirtysomething divorcee. But the play does not invite an easy cynicism. Her earnest, well-scrubbed sincerity and middle-class wholesomeness shining out in Amelia Bullmore's splendid performance, Laura is, you feel, a genuinely good woman with an anguished social conscience.

"I don't know what I want. What does what I want matter? We're all brought up on bloody want... What do you want for your birthday? What do you want for your wedding?... Do you want to forget your birthday? Do you want to forget thinking so hard and constantly about what you want?" Insofar as it's an attack on greed, Laura's long comic rant in the second scene does her credit, but insofar as it's symptomatic of a woman who needs to think that her own needs need not come into play, it augurs ill for her fundamentally unequal relationship with Eddie, who has lost everything including access to his little daughter.

An ironic fate, then, for such a heroine, that through a series of misapprehensions, she should end up being ritually humiliated by her drunken ex-lover in front of an appalled family, her attempted kindness dismissed as "all middle-class wank. Do something for some poor sod like me. Feel good about yourself... and get a fuck into the bargain." It's an excruciating moment, as is the scene where the schizophrenic woman, hideously dolled up, seeks out the 17-year-old at his public school in order to give him a shop cake. Which of us, in such circumstances, would have the courage to keep faith with the weak and helpless? But is that any argument for not getting involved in the first place?

n To 20 April. Booking: 0171-730 1745

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in