THEATRE / The grand old maid: Robert Hanks reviews Theatr Clwyd's Saint Joan at the Strand Theatre

Robert Hanks
Friday 22 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Saint Joan is one of those plays that, if you've read it before seeing it, you can't ever imagine in performance. It's so wordy, so indigestibly stuffed with ideas, and the characters are so thoroughly described in stage directions, rather than through their lines, that it seems inextricably tied to the page. It's an achievement just to keep it alive on stage for the whole three hours; but Gale Edwards' Theatr Clwyd production, now moved to the Strand, does considerably better than that, exposing behind all Shaw's verbiage and lecturing the play's sheer dramatic sweep.

Much of the sense of epic derives from Peter J Davison's design, which encloses the main acting area in massive, plain blocks of stone. These lift one at a time to create doors or reveal a series of beautifully composed tableaux (Joan, sword aloft, silhouetted against a huge cross of light; a red pennant floating against a mauve-tinged sky before Orleans). There are objections to be made to the detail of the design - what's the point of the slogans running around the walls, or the shining, empty breastplates ranked across the stage at the beginning? - but as a canvas for the actors to work with it functions brilliantly.

The only real disappointment is Imogen Stubbs's Joan. With her north-eastern accent, her unshakeable self- belief and her constant exhortations to get out and fight, she is oddly reminiscent of Jack Charlton (the main difference being that he has had a better relationship with the papacy). As far as it goes, that's surely pretty close to what Shaw wanted - somebody down-to-earth and practically minded. But it doesn't go far enough. She's too light to suggest the Maid's real strength: where she should seem fanatical and charismatic, she comes across as earnest and charming.

And while Stubbs gets plenty of individual moments well - her collapse before the threat of burning, say - she doesn't manage to give a sense of the role's arc, so to speak. Instead of character development, you get a series of ever- grimmer haircuts, shifting from long and flowing at the start, through short back and sides for her glory days, to a ragged crop for prison.

It's a measure of the strength of the production, though, that reservations about Stubbs's performance don't spoil your enjoyment of the play. The only other major part that leaves qualms is Jasper Britton's slouching, narrow Dauphin - he's very funny, but the tendency to caricature dilutes the impact of his appalling self-knowledge (he accepts her imposition of kingship with the qualification 'I shan't be able to keep it up, I warn you').

Otherwise, the supporting cast is uniformly fine, particularly Ken Bones as the Earl of Warwick - relaxed and predatory, indicating a powerful, pragmatic intellect holding in check a natural ferocity.

The most impressive thing, though, is how well Shaw's play has survived 70 years. True, it's at times hectoring and prolix, the political analysis unconvincingly reductive. But his jibes against the English still hold water (as when Warwick softens the word 'traitor' with the explanation: 'In our country it means simply one who is not wholly devoted to our English interests'); and in the way the self-interest of the ruling class is dressed up as realism, you may hear an unpleasantly contemporary ring.

Strand Theatre, London WC2 (071-930 8800)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in