THEATRE REVIEW '93 / Facing the final curtain: Tom Stoppard's Arcadia is the experts' choice. Robert Hanks followed its transfer from stage to radio

Robert Hanks
Tuesday 21 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BACK in the early years of radio, it was easy to transfer a play from the West End on to the airwaves more or less intact: all you did was stick a microphone on the stage. Such simplicity, such purity: Arcadia.

Arcadia, on the other hand, is another matter. Tom Stoppard's ingenious collision of literary biography with chaos theory in a Derbyshire stately home is being broadcast on Radio 3 next Sunday, with the same cast that opened it at the National Theatre this April. The attraction of this transfer is obvious: for a start, you have a cast that knows the play back to front. David Benedictus, who directed the radio version, says that, 'If one was starting from scratch, one wouldn't have that cast: I don't think one could afford it.'

But there were disadvantages, too. Stoppard himself minimises the differences between the play on stage and on radio: 'Character is what people say, not what people look like.' Benedictus, who had to cope with the play's time-scheme - flipping between 1809 and the present - is less blase. He is still unsure that the action will be as explicit for the listener as it was for the viewer.

The actors, too, have had their share of troubles. Bill Nighy, who plays a 20th-century academic researching Byron's doings in the Derbyshire of 1809, has done plenty of radio work. This was a new challenge, though. He had to abandon timing built up over months of knowing when the audience was going to laugh, and a physical identity he had created for the character. He also had to find an entirely new level of performance: 'I walked in, walked up to the microphone, started to do it as I do it on stage, and nearly blew the speakers.' Once he'd turned down the volume, 'Quite quickly it became an advantage to just talk to someone in a naturalistic way, rather than in a theatrical setting.' Emma Fielding, who plays a 13-year-old mathematical prodigy in the 19th-century scenes, found that the intimacy of radio helped her on stage: 'It's back to the rehearsal room: you rediscover things that you've lost sight of with a large audience.'

In the end, the justification for the radio production is not what it does for the actors. Benedictus puts his finger on it: 'More people will get to hear it on that one radio transmission than will have seen it all year . . . A radio production is a very good way of making the National Theatre a national theatre.'

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in