THEATRE / King Lear - Lilian Baylis

Nick Curtis
Monday 14 December 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In their determination to speak each line - sometimes each syllable - of King Lear with pregnant emphasis, Compass Theatre divest the play of emotional meaning. From the start, Lear is a capricious baby, his elder daughters vicious bitches; the extremes of feeling reached in the first scene leave the characters no space to develop. This is particularly true of Nick Chadwin's Lear, who oscillates between whining selfishness and congested, spluttering rage. The blur of his lines ensures that any pity or awe Lear might inspire is smothered by the urge to give this overgrown brat a good slapping. The booming Gloucester similarly fails to evoke sympathy.

Whereas this company's Hamlet made no concession to the necessities of doubling roles, here they seem sporadically self-conscious about it. Sometimes they change character on stage, daring the audience with a hard stare to dispute the theatrical reality. At other times, they canter breathlessly offstage before hurriedly re-entering as someone else. The costumes, too, are inconsistent: torn evening wear and smudged underwear, a parody of refugee or dosser garb so inappropriate it further devalues the production.

There are two stirring moments, when Lear's three daughters rattle huge sheets of metal hanging at the back of the stage to represent the storm and the battle. But the rousing volume of these interludes simply supplies a counterfeit sense of theatrical vigour so obviously wanting elsewhere.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in