Wuthering Heights, Alhambra Theatre, Bradford

Nadine Meisner
Sunday 29 September 2002 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Nixon's new Wuthering Heights for Northern Ballet Theatre will probably be a hit – although at only two hours long it still had me glancing twitchingly at my watch. The plentiful pas de deux that form the ballet's backbone will probably wow audiences – although their intended intensity to me felt closer to bathos, too clichéd and repetitive to strike the heart with fresh force. After the deft assurance of Nixon's Madame Butterfly and I Got Rhythm (previously staged elsewhere), maybe we had been expecting too much and this, his first original work for NBT, comes as something of a disappointment.

The ballet concentrates on the early part of Emily Brontë's novel, the Cathy-Heathcliff generation, which is a relief, given the confusing entanglement of Brontë's later genealogy. This means that some of the original details, in Patricia Doyle's dramaturgy, are modified, with Cathy dying not in childbirth but of a fever, after a night on the moors.

It is a clever wheeze to give the younger versions of Cathy and Heathcliff entrances throughout the ballet, to contrast with their adult selves. But otherwise the surprise is how conventionally straightforward the ballet's approach is – admirably terse, yes, and clear, but boringly, pedestrianly reiterating the familiar narrative, when we might have expected a more imaginative, evocative take. We have been here so many times before, in films, and even ballets, including a previously disastrous Brontë blockbuster by the same company. Ali Allen's designs are similarly terse: succinct sections of wall or curtain that operate smooth scene changes and leave plenty of space. The result, though, lacks atmosphere, while the risible snowstorms on the moors appear like sprays of confetti, probably hurled in handfuls from a sack.

Ah t'moors, t'moors! Scene of so many encounters between Cathy and Heathcliff, Heathcliff and Cathy... Charlotte Talbot is as wildly beautiful as you could hope for. Jonathan Ollivier is correctly swarthy and brooding and very sexy, especially when dressed in black leather. He also wields a riding crop which he cynically uses to stroke and taunt in his seduction of poor, vulnerable Isabella (Desiré Samaai).

The riding crop is a blunder; more titter-inducing prop than vivid symbol of Heathcliff's ruthlessness. Another mistake is the underwhelming invention of the choreo- graphy, which blights not only the pas de deux, but causes Hironao Takahashi's Edgar to come across as more wimpish than necessary. And then there is Claude-Michel Schönberg's score, by turns self-importantly pumping and swelling or drifting into becalmed lyricism. It is direly obtrusive; it is unavoidable, it won't go away.

Touring to March 2003

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in