The Nutcracker, Royal Festival Hall, London

Zo Anderson
Thursday 01 January 2004 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

For a company founded in 1929, the Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet look awfully young. The dancers are eager and energetic, but still raw. There isn't the polish or assurance of a company style to hold them together.

The name suggests a dramatic emphasis, the company's old connection to the Moscow Arts Theatre and Stanislavsky's famous acting "method". In fact, this Nutcracker, credited to Vasily Vainonen, rushes over the ballet's plot, avoiding mime wherever possible. Dancers look adrift in character roles. The grandmother of the party scene is surely no older than the girls playing little-boy guests. Her age is represented by a crinoline, and she moves too lightly inside those heavy skirts.

Dancing grandmothers needn't be old. But they should play their roles fully, and they should be part of an onstage world. This production never quite creates one. Steps and drama are non-specific, and the company's cheerful dancing isn't enough to lift them.

When Drosselmeyer gives his goddaughter, Masha, the Nutcracker doll, they both dance on without suggesting the doll cracks nuts: Tchaikovsky's score rattles in vain. Under Georgy Zhemchuzhin, the Moscow Stanislavsky Orchestra provided soupy violins and tentative brass.

Masha falls asleep and dreams that her Nutcracker becomes a handsome prince, but the transformation doesn't have much impact. Even the designs, by Vladimir Arefyev, can't decide between streamlined and lavish.

The first act is framed by cut-paper squares that could be Christmas cards. At the Stahlbaum Christmas party, guests in lightweight Regency costumes dance on an almost bare stage: no backdrop and hardly any furniture. The second act is no longer a kingdom of sweets but a characterless Fairyland. The set is hung with strings of wire cages, perhaps minimalist Christmas decorations, and the National dancers all wear pompoms.

The ballet's magic is shaky. Drosselmeyer does conjure dancing toys for the party, but it looks skimped when you can see the soloists' feet as they sneak in behind his cloak. Transformations are on the thin side - this is surely the first Nutcracker to feature a shrinking Christmas tree.

The dancers look happier in the dances of the second act. National dancers pounce on their roles, but the steps are repetitive: men jump forever, women jump on pointe. Footwork tends to be rugged. The corps de ballet waltzes of snowflakes and flowers are tidily drilled and attentive.

As Masha, Natalia Krapivina holds fire until the grand pas de deux. Once in a tutu, she dances with stronger feet and more authority, quietly partnered by Georgy Smilevski. The choreography is a very long way after Ivanov.

Until 6 January (020-7960 4242)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in