​The Best Man, The Playhouse, London, review: It pales in comparison to current White House melodramas

Set at a presidential nominating convention, Gore Vidal’s ​The Best Man​, which premiered on Broadway in March 1960 and has now transferred to the West End, tells the story of a race between two fictional politicians – the upright and experienced former Secretary William Russell, and the ruthless, “plain spoken” Senator Joe Cantwell. Nine points up, with the former president’s endorsement due any moment, the nomination is Russell’s to lose.

In the US’s arcane system for choosing its leaders, when parties enter a convention without a clear frontrunner, the presidential nominees go through a series of ballots by delegates and superdelegates from the various states of the Union. Rather than showing the vote trading and persuasion techniques used to win over these voting delegates, the primary action of ​The Best Man ​takes places before a single ballot is cast. Vidal’s play centres on the real power struggles: the backroom deals, smear threats, and outright blackmail.

As exciting as all the premise sounds, ​The Best Man​ falls slightly flat. Taking some time to warm up, the action is confined to conversation that should crackle with the electricity of ideas bouncing off one another, but at times feels like a seminar. Moreover, the shocking cynicism of the 1960s feels rather tame now. The idea that candidates do dirty deals in smoke-filled rooms fails to shock in 2018.

Jeff Fahey as Cantwell is vibrant as the morally lax populist. Fahey exudes the ambition and dogged obsession of the demagogue politician. Slick and ready to throw dirt to get elected, Vidal based the character on the upstarts, red scaremongerers of the time – John F Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Estes Kefauver, and Joe McCarthy. Martin Shaw as Russell suffers from the fact that Russell himself is something of a bore – although we’re repeatedly told how charming he is, the Russell presented to the audience is something of a pious, sermonising, smart alec.

Maureen Lipman as the representative of women in the party has some of the best lines, and her appearances are to be savoured in what can at times be dry exchanges. Lipman, dressed in twinset-and-pearls, and flamboyant hats to epitomise middle America, teaches Russell three important and timeless lessons of politics; don’t be too smart, have an inoffensive wife, and don’t ever get into an argument about your mental health. Vidal’s play was prescient of the fate that befell Thomas Eagleton, the one-time vice-presidential candidate who was forced to drop out of the 1972 White House race once his psychiatric records became public. Depressingly, the issues feel as true today as when Gore wrote them 57 years ago.

Despite the topical political discussion the whole thing leaves one unmoved. Vidal’s scenes among the political wives exchanging backhanded compliments are of course some of the strongest, but due to the fact these characters are amalgams of real people, even strong delivery by the cast prevents any sort of emotional connection to the audience from taking shape. Russell and Cantwell’s fate is of note, but hardly gut-wrenching. Although lauded for its relevance, it pales in comparison to current White House melodramas, being too tame to entertain fully.

Until 12 May (www.atgtickets.com/venues/playhouse-theatre)