Kenneth Macmillan Triple Bill, Royal Opera House, London, **

John Percival
Sunday 04 May 2003 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

To put Kenneth MacMillan's first creation for the Royal Ballet and his last on a triple bill with one typical intervening work seemed a neat idea. But in practice it makes a depressing evening.

Danses concertantes, created in 1955 as he began his career, is the redeeming element. To Stravinsky's score, attractively jaunty and quirky (even if too stolidly played this time under Richard Bernas's direction), MacMillan was inspired by his amazing original cast – every one of them ideal for the roles – to invent unexpected, humorous, spiky patterns of dance.

The ballet introduced a uniquely gifted young designer, too: Nicholas Georgiadis, who similarly matched the music's individuality with his unusual shapes, decorations and colours. Subsequent new designs, by Georgiadis and others, were never as good, and it is brilliant to have something quite close to the original restored here. But the solo women's skirts need correcting – too long and too symmetrical. And brighter lighting wouldn't hurt.

The revival has two casts, and the second night was much the better. Tamara Rojo brought an angular fluency to the ballerina's role that had been missing before, and she also achieves an alluring sense of mystery in the strange section where her thumbs and first fingers turn into masks. Ricardo Cervera doesn't quite equal the first night's Johan Kobborg for virtuosity as the solo man, but he shows more of the intended tough-guy attack, and managed the star-pattern end of his main solo better. José Martin, Jane Burn and Laura Morera likewise make the better trio for the other featured parts.

So far, so good, but now things take a serious turn for the worse. The two remaining ballets are both lugubriously miserable in content: a poor choice for juxtaposition. Also, they both have elaborate, overpowering sets that apparently necessitate interminable intermissions: whatever became of the rebuilt theatre's vaunted facility for quick changes?

MacMillan's last ballet, The Judas Tree, is just plain nasty. Sex and violence are all very well, but this dose, all 35 minutes of it, is simply pointless. What make it even more objectionable are the repeated but never justified religious references, identifying a whore, who is gang-raped and apparently murdered, with the Mother of God. Mara Galeazzi doesn't get anywhere with that role, which undermines Irek Mukhamedov's intense performance as the foreman. Isabel McMeekan is nearer the mark in the finesse of her playing opposite the hard-working Jonathan Cope.

Gloria is one of MacMillan's ballets to choral music, so it's a pity that the singers have been moved from their former post adjoining the proscenium arch down to pit level, where they don't come over so well.

The words that Poulenc set from the Catholic Mass make a sarcastic accompaniment to the choreographer's perhaps too abstract representation of ghosts from the First World War. To make their point, the dances certainly need more meaningful performance than they are getting. When people applaud during the action, in spite of a programme note asking that they don't, you know that the dramatic intentions are not getting across.

To 14 May (020-7304 4000)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in