Drawing the Line, theatre review: 'A fresh perspective on India's partition'

Hampstead Theatre, London

Paul Taylor
Wednesday 11 December 2013 09:41 EST
Comments
Silas Carson and Tanveer Ghani in Drawing the Line at Hampstead Theatre
Silas Carson and Tanveer Ghani in Drawing the Line at Hampstead Theatre (Alastair Muir)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Partition of India is a massive subject but in this powerful new piece Howard Brenton has had the fertile idea of approaching it from the perspective of a forgotten but crucial player.

Cyril Radcliffe was a British judge who knew nothing about India or maps but, in 1947, he was sent there by Prime Minister Clement Attlee to draw the line that would divide the sub-continent into two separate states. To add to the black absurdity, he was given just five weeks to complete the job.

Premiered in Howard Davies's lucid, elegant production, the play presents Radcliffe (excellent Tom Beard) as a tragicomic figure – a decent man who is driven to despair by the gradual realisation that, whatever he does, there will be a bloodbath.

A cynical hypocrite in Brenton's estimation, Viceroy Mountbatten (Andrew Havill) declares that 100, 000 deaths would be “an acceptable level of violence” and the play speculates about the pressures he may have brought to bear on Radcliffe because of his wife Edwina's affair with Nehru (a magnetic Silas Carson). Not all of it works (the handling of Gandhi feels stilted) but it's a fascinating play which views colonial culpability from an unexpected and singularly revealing angle.

To January 11; 020 7722 9301

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in