Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Spamalot royalties row goes to the High Court. But who will winalot?

Hit musical at centre of unholy row among comedians over share of the profits

Lewis Smith
Friday 30 November 2012 20:00 EST
Comments
Michael Palin with Tim Curry and Eric Idle at the opening of Spamalot in New York in 2005
Michael Palin with Tim Curry and Eric Idle at the opening of Spamalot in New York in 2005 (Rex Features)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Terry Jones, Michael Palin and Eric Idle are due to appear as witnesses next week as the latest row about royalties from the Monty Python musical Spamalot reaches the High Court.

The Python team are being challenged by Mark Forstater, the producer of the Monty Python and the Holy Grail film, who wants a bigger share of the Spamalot profits.

Moreover, his lawyers claim that he should be regarded as the seventh Python, an equal to Jones, Palin, Idle, John Cleese, Terry Gilliam and the late Graham Chapman.

The hit musical is a spin-off from the film, but one that has provoked renewed bickering among the Python team. A year ago Idle announced he had sacked Cleese as the voice of God in the musical and in defending the move said: "It wasn't mean – he's had millions of dollars from it. He charges people a fortune for using his voice. He's always been in financial crisis."

It prompted a riposte from Cleese: "I see Yoko Idle's been moaning (again), about the royalties he had to pay the other Pythons for Spamalot. Apparently, he paid me "millions". Actual, rough figures last time we checked: Yoko Idle $13m, Michael Palin $1.1m, the others just under a million each."

Forstater already gets one twenty-eighth of the merchandising deals resulting from the Holy Grail, and by extension Spamalot, but is claiming that he should get twice as much to bring him on a par with the others.

Tom Weisselberg, appearing for Forstater yesterday told Mr Justice Norris at the High Court: "Regrettably, the parties have not been able to resolve the dispute. Mr Forstater is in difficult financial circumstances and has been forced to bring these proceedings."

The film producer was made bankrupt in June, although the bankruptcy was annulled last month. The claim is being brought by Mr Forstater and his company Mark Forstater Productions Ltd against Python (Monty) Pictures Ltd (PMP), which represents the film interests of the Python team, and Freeway Cam (UK) Ltd, which holds the copyright in the Holy Grail.

Mr Weisselberg told the court: "The outrage expressed by a number of Pythons … is, with respect to them, misguided."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in