Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Imagine: a 'Lennon' musical without the Beatles' hits

David Usborne
Monday 15 August 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If you can't make good theatre out of Lennon then you are probably in the wrong profession. But why the cynicism? The producers surely had all the ingredients for a blockbuster show - songs that nearly all of us can hum and a life story that is compelling.

And yet theatre is what is most painfully missing from Lennon, which opened on Broadway on Sunday. Some critics are calling it the latest of the "jukebox" musicals to hit New York in the vein of (the wildly successful) Mama Mia. But this jukebox takes $100 bills only and is, I fear, a mighty swizz.

At least give us a decent set design. For its visual richness, Lennon relies almost entirely on backdrop projections. It just leaves you thinking "low budget".

The most creative stroke may have been the decision by Don Scardino, the writer and director, to have all nine of his performers take turns to portray Lennon. Apparently, this is meant to denote the universality of his appeal. You know which actor is playing Lennon when they wear round wire-rim glasses.

The oddly amateurish feel about the show is not the fault of the cast. All have voices worthy of the Great White Way and when Julia Murney takes us through Lennon's paternal ode to his now 30-year-old son, Sean, "Beautiful Boy", the theatre began, at last, to resonate. The favourite with the audiences is likely to be Will Chase who emerges as the main Lennon. His performance was probably the most affecting.

Scardino faithfully takes us through the life of Lennon from his birth in 1940 - our cues here are a handy back-projection of Churchill and a joke about Hitler and his one ball - through to his death outside the Dakota Building 25 years ago.

The problem is that the show necessarily becomes terribly linear. And then he met Paul (portrayed here by an African-American actor), and then he married Cynthia, and then he met Ono. And then, and then and then ...

Yoko Ono collaborated throughout the show's gestation and it is no surprise that the largest chunk of it deals with her and Lennon's sometimes controversial love and partnership.

Musically, it also largely a post-Beatles affair. Infuriatingly, we are treated to only one original Beatles song and that is "The Ballad of John and Yoko", plus two of the Fab Four cover version songs, performed on this stage by four of the female cast members. Some Lennon fans might consider a musical about his life without more Beatles content something close to heresy.

The assassination of Lennon gives the director a chance finally to grab us. We all know it is coming, after all. And there is poignancy when Will Chase's Lennon confesses near the night's end to feeling like he is on the brink of a new life, better than his first 40 years. But then Scardino bottles out, recording Lennon's violent death through the recollections of a policemen on the scene.

Ono says now that her husband would have loved this show. She should know, but you have to wonder. He might, of course, have had a good chuckle because at the end of the day, Lennon is just daft, telling us almost nothing about him we didn't know already and missing nearly every opportunity to make us laugh or cry. But we do at least hum, especially through the end number. And that is "Imagine".

The reviews

"A fierce primal scream - of the kind Ms Ono is famous for as a performance and recording artist - is surely the healthiest response to the agony of Lennon ...This drippy version of his life ... suggests he was just a little lost boy looking for love in all the wrong places until he found Ms Ono and discovered his inner adult." - New York Times

"Lennon ... does everything it can to blow John's simple songs into something garish and grand. This they call a tribute?" - New York Daily News

"Ono released a couple of 'new' songs for Lennon - 'India, India,' ... and 'I Don't Want to Lose You,' ... to illustrate Lennon's return to Ono after a separation. Five years later he was dead and Ono has been protecting ... their love story ever since ... Ultimately, Lennon seems less like his story than an extended remix of 'The Ballad of John and Yoko'. - The Boston Globe

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in