THEATRE / A twist in the cocktail: Paul Taylor on Design for Living at the Donmar
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The design on the poster and the programme for Sean Mathias's revelatory Donmar revival of Design for Living is studiedly deceptive. At first (or even second and third) glance, you seem to be looking at a cocktail glass into which an olive is tumbling from on high. Then it dawns on you that the olive might actually be a navel, and that the glass has a pair of vertical lips swimming in it . . .
Now, while Coward and cocktails go together like prunes and custard, Coward and the human vagina are not so regularly associated. Indeed, even though Design for Living famously focuses on a threesome who end up, after various pairings, in a menage a trois, the atmosphere of a standard production is dismayingly, evasively neuter rather than charged with genuine erotic ambiguity.
You realise how thoroughly Mathias means to change this from the opening moments when, wrapped only in a makeshift sarong and to a sultry soundtrack, Rachel Weisz's devastatingly sexy Gilda emerges from her bedroom into the dark, tousled Paris studio. Cocking her bare leg on the fridge, she sensuously strokes it and then basks, in a manner that's both arousing and delightfully ridiculous, in the fridge's electric glare. It's a safe bet she has not left an empty bed.
Rather as Philip Prowse's 1989 production of The Vortex played for real the drug fixes and mother-fixation in Coward's first big success, so Mathias makes sure that the carnal compulsion that keeps drawing this trio together does not get sublimated or euphemised as just a shared ritzier-than-thou chic. He also keeps it funny. The raw, wrenched emotions that are on display are given a further boost of immediacy by the fact that the production's look has one foot in the Thirties and one in the present, the men's clothes sometimes suggesting no great gap from Gap. Clive Owen and Paul Rhys as the men speak in, respectively, a flat Midlands accent and a Welsh-tinged one. Without under-selling the wit, the rhythm of the lines has been refreshingly loosened up from the usual effete telegraphese.
It's a very funny as well as sexy account of the play. As the disapproving housekeeper, Johanna Kirby makes some hilarious interventions, including a splendid unscripted foray with a vacuum cleaner across the charmingly played drunk-scene that turns into mutual seduction between the two men. The New York episode, where the male pair are metamorphosed into a top-hat-and-tails double act, all smirks and mascara as they shock the rich Philistines, here deliriously knocks the lid off a straight couple's clearly neurosis-ridden marriage. Mathias ensures you feel sorry for Gilda's marginalised husband, Ernest - mocked, as he exits, in mad parrot-house fashion by the menage. But he also lets you feel the potent seductiveness of the threesome in a production that would have brought out the bisexual in Noel Coward.
'Design for Living' is at the Donmar Warehouse, London WC2, until 5 Nov (Booking: 071-867 1150)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments