THE GUILLOTINE

Twentieth-Century Classics That Won't Last No 46: FILIPPO MARINETTI

Gilbert Adair
Saturday 20 November 1999 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The history of 20th-century art has been supremely a history of "isms". A handful of these have entered the sociocultural bloodstream, notably Cubism (a term now employed indiscriminately to describe virtually any painting of abstract or semi-abstract angularity) and Surrealism (whose adjectival form "surreal" has become shorthand for any even mildly bizarre experience). Others cling on frantically to the coat-tails of their most prestigious practitioners - how diminished would be the reputation of Fauvism, for example, were it not for the genius of Matisse. And others already resonate with the hollow ring of words bound for the dustbins of history. Quickly, now - name a Vorticist!

Or, for that matter, a Futurist. If Futurism is the saddest case of all, it's because of the hubris which its spokesman, the indefatigable Filippo Marinetti, courted in his choice of name for the movement, a hubris to which it duly fell victim. Is there any word quite as passe-sounding as "futuristic"? If it still has a science-fiction feel to it, it's surely the earliest examples of the genre that it reminds one of - Verne and Wells, the past's, rather than the present's, conception of the future.

Marinetti, a diminutive, pugnacious tyrant, eternally struggling to keep his troops in line, wrote manifestos the way other people write thank- you notes. (A whole collection of them was published several years ago, and quite a slab of a volume it was.) In febrile thrall to the cult of speed and movement, war and destruction, he worshipped the tank and the aeroplane and called for the Louvre to be razed to the ground. The problem was that the Futurists themselves attempted to convey this Marinettian dynamism with the traditional tools of the artist's craft - paint and canvas, marble and chisel - and strained to keep pace with a world that was evolving far more rapidly than they could. Their predicament called to mind the old joke of the man who spent years inventing the automobile, finally succeeded, rushed into the street to announce his discovery and was run over by one.

As for Marinetti himself, he was, perhaps not surprisingly, an early convert to what has been, alas, the most enduringly meaningful of all the century's "isms": Fascism. By then, the late 1920s, Futurism was finished. It was no longer an "ism" but a "wasm".

GILBERT ADAIR

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in