The 10 greatest adjectives of the 20th century

Miles Kington
Wednesday 03 March 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AS ANNOUNCED in this column yesterday, I am teaming up with ATP - Adjective Trend Plotting, the people who chart the world rankings of adjectives - to organise the poll for the Adjective of the Century.

"By this we mean the adjective which has most affected lives," says ATP boss, Oscar Beussberger. "We don't mean the adjective which has been most widely used. I mean, you wouldn't vote for the common cold as the Disease of the Century, would you! In fact, we think the most commonly used adjective in recent times is `new', and a boring little adjective it is too. No, what we're after is an adjective which is so ubiquitous and yet charismatic that it has wormed its way into people's conscious, unconscious and subconscious!

"By the way, I think I have already used some of the prime candidates for the adjective of the year in my introductory speech, namely `ubiquitous', `charismatic' and `conscious'. Not to mention `prime'."

Can you vote for an adjective you don't like?

"Certainly!" booms the extrovert Oscar Beussberger. (Incidentally, did you notice another candidate there - `extrovert'?) "I'm all for it! Some of the most unpleasant adjectives are actually some of the most insidiously useful. `Inappropriate' is probably the nastiest adjective around today, but so many people hide behind it that I fear it will get many votes. `Dystopian' and `dysfunctional' are two more examples of what I call Sunday- paper adjectives, ie pretentious, over-used and near-meaningless. Ghastly, all of them, but I expect them to get votes."

Oscar Beussberger says that most fashionable adjectives tend to come from specialised areas and then to win appeal on a broad front. The arts have given us adjectives like "mimetic", "aleatory", "noir", and "cathartic". Medicine has given us "chronic" and "clinical". The law has given us "draconian" and "forensic", as well as "proven".

"Oddly enough," says Oscar, "`proven' was never found outside Scotland till recently, in the Scottish verdict `not proven', but it was then taken up by the world of advertising, which is always desperately looking for old-fashioned synonyms. Have you noticed the way `cleanse' has replaced `clean' in ads, for example? `Cleanse' sounds more trustworthy, doesn't it ? Sounds as if it gets deeper than mere `cleaning', doesn't it? Similarly, they have taken to using `proven' because it sounds more solid than `proved'. `With proven cleansing qualities...'

"Of course, a lot of these words change their meaning when they become popular, like `forensic' and `clinical' - or should I say that people use them wrongly? People use the word `forensic' as if it means something to do with laboratories or post-mortems, but it just means to do with the law. People use `chronic' to mean `terrible', even though it just means `long-lasting'.

"Another source of potent adjectives is the sociological field. `Disadvantaged', `feminist', `supportive' and `aware' might get a look in, though all these things have a limited shelf life. Not as limited as slang adjectives, of course. I doubt whether we shall get many votes from the young for `awesome' or `wicked' or `cool' or `mega', any more than we shall get votes from their parents for forgotten trendy adjectives like `groovy' and `fab' and `heavy'."

Oscar Beussberger shudders slightly, perhaps at the thought of his own youth.

"Anyway, the way the poll works is this. You, Mr Kington, ask your readers to nominate their choice for the 10 adjectives which most encapsulate the 20th century..."

And then I pass the voting forms across to you?

"You can if you like. It won't make much difference, though. We at the ATP have already selected the 10 adjectives most symbolic of the century. It wouldn't do to leave it to the voters, would it? Can't really trust the public, can we?"

But surely, of all things, adjectives are things that are used by the public? So they should know!

"Dear, oh dear, oh dear. That's like saying that cars are things used by the public, so they should know how to use them. But all road deaths are caused by the public!"

Hmm. So what are your pre-selected top ten adjectives ?

"Got a list here somewhere," says Oscar Beussberger, searching his jacket pocket. "Yes, here we are. The top 10 typical 20th century adjectives are: Marxist, fascist, global, modern, genetic, corporate, gay, fat-free, user-friendly, carcinogenic and..."

And?

"Kafkaesque."

So that's it, then. At last, a millennial poll you don't have to vote in. It's all been settled for you.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in