Serial's Adnan Syed finally gets re-trial: Read the judge's order in full
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Adnan Syed, whose case was at the centre of Serial season 1, has been granted a re-trial by a Baltimore judge more than 16 years after he was sentenced.
Syed is currently serving life in prison plus 30 years, after being found guilty of the first-degree murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Mi Lee, along with kidnapping, false imprisonment in 2000.
Serial poked many holes in the case against him, which were picked up on in the petition for re-trial.
According to the court order, Judge Martin P. Welch granted the defense’s motion based on Adnan’s original defense attorney failing to cross-examine “the State’s cell tower expert about the reliability of cell tower location evidence.”
Hear's the judge's order in full:
ADNAN SYED, Petitioner, v., STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY CASE NOs. 199103042-046 PETITION NO. 10432
------
Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Petition for Post-Conviction Relief; the Maryland Court of Special Appeals May 18, 2015 Remand Order; the evidence and arguments presented at the February 2016 post-conviction hearing; and the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion 11 for the above-captioned case, it is this 30th day of June, 2016,
ORDERED that the record, which has been supplemented with Asia McClain’s January 13; 2015 affidavit and her subsequent testimony, shall be RE-TRANSMITTED to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals for further proceedings; and it is further
ORDERED that the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief as to trial counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance for the failure to contact a potential alibi witness is hereby DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief as to alleged prosecutorial misconduct of withholding potentially exculpatory evidence related to the reliability of cell tower location evidence is hereby DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief as to trial counsel’s alleged ineffective assistance for the failure to cross-examine the State’s cell tower expert about the reliability of cell tower location evidence is hereby GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Petitioner’s convictions in the above-captioned case with case nos. 199103042-046 are VACATED; and it is finally
ORDERED that Petitioner’s request for a new trial is hereby GRANTED.
Judge Martin P. Welch
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments