Right of Reply; Pauline Kidner
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Patron of the National Federation of Badger Groups responds to an article on Saturday by Duff Hart-Davis
THE NATIONAL Federation of Badger Groups is very concerned that a remark I made at a meeting in Gloucestershire has been misrepresented (report, 30 January) as our supporting the Culling Programme. In answer to a specific remark by Brian Jennings (NFU) stating that the NFBG would not put down an infectious TB badger that was suffering, I emphatically denied this. We follow very strict health regimes.
We are totally against the badger-culling programme as it is logistically impractical. More worryingly, farmers are openly admitting to taking matters into their own hands and killing badgers in the no-cull part of the triplet of experiments. While pounds 27m has been allocated to the culling programme, only pounds 7m is to be spent jointly on vaccine research and other areas of contributing factors such as trace element deficiency, animal husbandry and climate.
It is already accepted that TB incidences must be due to multiple factors and that badgers are not the single cause, which is why one farm will get a TB breakdown and the next-door one will not, even though they share the same social group of badgers.
Indeed it is still not possible to identify the difference between immune, infected and infectious badgers when they test positive. More than 20 years of culling have proved that this method does not work and some research shows that this can exacerbate the problem. Yet there are rumours of extended culling in addition to the experiment. Is this also to come out of the tax- payer's pocket?
With incidences of TB breakdowns increasing across the country attributed to cattle or badgers, involving different strains of TB that have never been seen before, we cannot continue to follow this blinkered approach.
Blaming the badger is a total red herring and the price of culling will mean that we shall soon run out of money and still have no answers to this serious problem.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments