Right of Reply: Nuala Scarisbrook

A trustee of the LIFE pressure group argues against the freezing of fertilised human eggs

Nuala Scarisbrook
Wednesday 19 August 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE 32-YEAR-OLD city banker whose career appears to be more important to her than having a family now - at the optimum age - has been praised by feminists for her plan to have a child manufactured by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and then frozen for eight years until she is "ready" to raise him or her. We are told that this latest step in designer family planning is going to liberate women.

The facts are less rosy. Most embryonic children do not survive the freezing process. There are unanswered worries about the effect of freezing on the few survivors. IVF itself has a low success rate, at best 20 per cent. There are research studies showing that IVF can damage women's health. So the likelihood of a "take-home baby" - to use suitable marketing jargon - is slim. This woman could well end up with no family.

A true feminist would not risk her own and her child's health, but would have her family at this optimum age and revel in the joy of loving and caring for her children. She should campaign to be able to return to work when her children are at school.

Feminists should not accept the timetable of the macho market and banking world, as this woman is planning to do, where career-paths and financial rewards are rated more highly than the unique joy of caring for your children.

Above all, we must always remember that children are not products, to be manufactured and stored until busy adults can spare time for them. The human embryo is truly an embryonic person. This latest addition to the ugly catalogue of manipulating and trivialising human life which Warnock and then the IVF pioneers unleashed is not something of which a civilised society should be proud.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in