Right of Reply: Mike O'Brien

Mike O'Brien
Thursday 10 June 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Home Office minister responds

to an article by

Ken Livingstone

on the Immigration and Asylum Bill

BRITAIN HAS a long tradition of providing safety for those who flee state persecution from abroad. Yet our ability to help genuine refugees is being undermined by those who abuse our system to evade normal immigration rules.

Ken has ignored the facts. From the Second World War until the late 1980s, asylum applications ran at about 4-5,000 a year. Most were accepted as genuine. Today, 45,000 applications are made a year with only 30 per cent given a right to stay of which 17 per cent are granted refugee status.

I can't imagine where Ken gets his figures from, but virtually all asylum applications from some countries - such as Afghanistan, Somalia and Iraq - are successful. Yet from many others - including Poland and China, very few establish a claim to asylum.

Our Bill's simple aim is to make the system fairer, faster and firmer - to bring some order to a system which benefits no one, least of all the genuine asylum-seeker.

Currently, about half receive cash benefits equivalent to 90 per cent of income support. The rest have to rely on local authority help. The burden for supporting this group has fallen on London, including Ken's local council, Brent - I'm surprised he doesn't seem concerned about the pressure on his own borough.

Our new system will provide good quality accommodation and support for all asylum-seekers, particularly families with children.

This Bill will help make the application system swifter. Most cases will take two months for an initial decision, plus four months for appeals - we will fast-track new family claimants from next April. It will also deliver our manifesto commitment to a streamlined right of appeal for visitors, and judicial oversight for those in detention.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in