Right of reply: Maurice Gran on criticisms of his thriller Wall of Silence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.'One psychopathic Orthodox Jew . . . would have sufficed. (But) the police interview a Hasid in prison for fraud, learn that the murder victim was generous because he bailed out another fraudster, and discover yet another sect member is a bigamist.' David Cesarini, Guardian
'Against accusations of anti-Semitism, Gran, Marks and Warren Mitchell have rather ingenuously cited their own Jewishness and protested that (it) depicts the close-knit family values of the community. This is simply specious.' Thomas Sutcliffe, Independent
'The plot got too complex for me to fathom . . . But that did not in the least detract from the programme's undoubted entertainment value.' Peter Paterson, Daily Mail
'Having Hasidic Jews use martial arts to fight on the streets of north London was a preposterous idea . . . I suggest writers Marks and Gran stick to what they do best - dreaming up sexploits for Dirty Dorien in Birds of a Feather.' Daily Star
I RESPECT David Cesarini's criticism that we heated our drama with dysfunctional Hasidism, but it would be a simplistic assumption that, because people in works of fiction commit misdeeds, that's characteristic of the population. You get that reaction every time you represent a minority group.
The Standard and Independent took us to task, but the Independent was reasonably well-argued: it's good to get 'ingenuous' and 'specious' in the same paragraph. There were moments when we were working on the far edge of our knowledge, but I wanted to get beyond the idea of Jews as a homogeneous group and I think our view of the Hasidim was not inflammatory.
Peter Paterson had the humility to say he'd lost the thread but that it didn't matter: he thinks people should ring up their friends and explain it to one another, so the aftermath of a thriller is a sort of social interchange.
The Star is not a paper whose strictures on credibility I'd lose sleep over: I found the idea of Refusenik martial artists completely unbelievable too, but it's true. I'm not cut to the quick by their review, not even to the slow.
Critics' prevailing weakness is their inability to use the words 'in my opinion'. We'll probably do a sequel now, Wall of Silence II, but we haven't decided which minority group to court the aggravation of: TV critics maybe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments