Right of Reply: Graham Wynne

The chief executive of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds replies to a feature article that was critical of bird watchers

Graham Wynne
Wednesday 21 October 1998 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CLIVE GAMMON ("I'm in Bognor, any chance of a quick bird?", 21 October) is quite right when he says that Britain is increasingly a nation of bird-lovers, but any anoraks are worn with pride.

We may be bird crazy, but this certainly doesn't make us feather-brained. Birds are easy to enjoy and develop an active interest in, they are visible in all seasons and they both look good and sound good.

Their presence indicates a healthy environment and reassures us that all is not lost. The growing numbers of people who are prepared to support their conservation through the RSPB and similar organisations in the UK and world-wide provide some hope for the future.

The BBC Natural History Unit's Life of Birds series deserves to attract a global viewing audience with its wonderful mix of entertainment and education.

They can marvel at the awesome variety and tenacity of birds, a vivid illustration of what we stand to lose by not taking action to save vital habitats, from Cardiff Bay to the vanishing rainforests. The loss of such irreplaceable places is a loss not just to wildlife but also to the whole of humankind.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds is not "reluctant" to discuss its finances. On the contrary, our annual report has recently been published and gives full details of our income and expenditure: 80 per cent of our income is spent on a wide range of conservation actions both here and abroad.

Our members and the millions more who value birds and other wildlife so highly are the public voice for conservation in the UK.

Their enthusiasm and support offers hope for the future of the wonderful variety of birds and wildlife that we still have. It makes perfect sense that this diversity should prompt both celebration and active conservation - and millions of people agree.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in