Right of Reply Dr Grant Kelly

Dr Grant Kelly
Wednesday 08 December 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A general practitioner with

the NHS responds to yesterday's article detailing

the launch of the Internet version of NHS Direct,

the 24-hour medical helpline

NOWADAYS, WEB technology is a New Labour talisman, and clarity of purpose disappears provided an "e-innovation" can be announced with ministerial fanfare. And so with NHS Direct Online. Laudably, the service intends to inform people, and so reduce demands on an over-pressed NHS. That may be a good premise, but why use Web technology? It's the wrong technology for the task.

Leaving aside arguments about the accuracy of diagnosis, Internet decision support systems can provide information, but they cannot put that knowledge into context.

Context is vital for illness advice, and the trained human supplies context that is matched to the patient and circumstances. Most people instinctively know this, and in circumstances of illness few will place all their trust in this site for their guidance.

Equally understandable is the site's own anxiety to avoid mistakes, often referring the patient back to phoning NHS Direct, its natural competitor.

Speaking to a trained nurse over the phone refines the ability of the patient to frame his or her question properly, and allows exchange of ideas and better understanding of the problem the person faces. This produces greater satisfaction and, ultimately, less resource usage.

The families that really need the knowledge are less likely to have access to computers and, with an ill child, would they choose to lift the phone, or trek down to the local chemist to look up a website for advice?

Will it reduce demand? Oh, please. Advertising never results in reduced demand, and increasing the knowledge of patients about what our under- funded NHS should supply (but doesn't), will please neither patients nor staff. Another NHS/ IT own goal gained by trying to fit the people to the technology.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in