Right of Reply: Debra Shipley

The Labour MP, a sponsor of the Protection of Children Act, reacts to Diane Coyle's recent article in which the legislation was criticised as over-protective of children

Debra Shipley
Sunday 08 August 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I DON'T know to whom the headline "What our children really need is a regime of benign neglect" is designed to appeal, but it certainly doesn't appeal to me. If Diane Coyle were to read letters in my postbag, the notion that neglect can ever be benign would be quickly banished.

Organisations such as the NSPCC are at the sharp end of child-related issues. Its officers see first-hand the abuse that children suffer - from strangers, from childcare workers and from family members. It is not a climate of fear that is developing but a climate of honesty. And not before time.

For years and years children were physically, mentally and sexually abused by those who were meant to protect them. Now, at last, their voices are being heard and their stories believed.

When I brought in the Protection of Children Act (which makes vetting of potential childcare workers a statutory duty), I was shocked at the paucity of existing safety regulations to protect children. The Government is now proposing that it should be a criminal offence for a convicted abuser to seek work with children.

My Act and the Government's proposals certainly don't add up to a "bureaucrat with powers over other people's jobs". Rather the legislation will help protect the vulnerable and provide a degree of peace of mind for genuinely concerned adults.

Ms Coyle states that "we must accept that there are bad carers, bad parents, and bad people". OK, so we accept it. Now let's do something about it. So what about this notion of "benign neglect"? Neglect is neglect is neglect. A child who isn't fed properly, loved, protected, educated, is neglected. There is nothing remotely benign about neglect.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in