Right of Reply: A Falkland Islands councillor answers Ken Livingstone's article on the Falklands war

Mike Summers
Wednesday 28 October 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE FALKLANDS have been continuously inhabited by families of principally British descent for 165 years and, until the Argentine invasion in 1982, had been a peaceful farming community.

Successive British governments have recognised and supported our right to determine our own political allegiance. This is supported by the UN Charter which clearly states that self-determination is the right of all peoples.

We have full employment, with education, health and other community services free - all issues close to Mr Livingstone's heart.

These achievements are threatened by Argentina which since 1982 has enshrined its claim permanently in the constitution and is threatening economic sanctions against companies involved in oil and fishing in the Falkland Islands.

What it failed to gain by military means it is now intent on gaining by economic blackmail. This is a far cry from the peaceful overtones of President Menem's visit.

The Argentine claim to sovereignty over the Falklands does not have any basis in modern constitutional thinking. A foreign power governing a people of different culture and way of life, against their will, would be unwelcome colonialism of the kind that Mr Livingstone so abhors.

It is to Britain's credit that we are able to determine our own future.

If Argentina were to take a truly democratic and mature view of its position in the South Atlantic it would respect the rights of the Islands and drop its claim to sovereignty, and the threat of economic sanctions.

Then we could all live in peace as good neighbours and truly consign the war to the historians.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in