Right of Reply

Heather Hallett: The Chairman of the Bar Council responds to criticism of the level of barristers' fees

Heather Hallett
Monday 22 June 1998 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHILST A very small number at the top of the profession do earn fees of over pounds 200,000 a year, this is not the case for the overwhelming majority. For them, the prospect of earning such a sum is as likely as winning the National Lottery.

Most criminal legal aid work is covered by a system of fixed Graduated Fees. It has clear, easily regulated, rates of pay. Typical basic fees for appearing in a contested trial are pounds 808.50 plus pounds 207 a day for a junior barrister and pounds 1,616.50 plus pounds 413.50 for a Queen's Counsel (QC).

In other cases, all bills have to be approved by an expert known as the Determining Officer, who is employed by the Government. Cases taken to the House of Lords are exceptional. It is very difficult to draw up a bill assessing one's worth and work. That is why the role of the Determining Officer is so important. To suggest that payments are only for the two or three days in the Lords is nonsense, as appeals take months of preparation.

In all cases, payments include VAT and the cost of running a Chambers. Barristers are self-employed and do not get the benefits of being employed: regular income, pension and sickness/holiday pay. To earn the same as a hospital consultant after deductions, a barrister would need to be paid fees of pounds 200,000 a year. Most QCs doing criminal legal aid work would receive about pounds 150,000, giving an annual income of about pounds 80,000 before tax. Unsurprisingly, the Lord Chancellor's Department has stepped away from supporting the proposal to link senior barristers' pay to consultants', having seen the figures.

I do not say criminal legal aid barristers are poorly paid, but I resent suggestions that we are milking the legal aid fund.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in