Right of Reply
Last week, Natasha Walter criticised the historical focus of so many books by modern novelists. Here the writer Deborah Moggach replies to those remarks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NATASHA WALTER argues that we're suffering from a glut of novels set in the past. I suspect she was speaking as an exhausted Booker judge, and that when she recovers she will realise that novels that plunge us into other centuries are wonderfully enriching for the imagination. After all, how better to discover history than through stories? She herself admits that "what drives the popularity of these books is a desire to experience the past so precisely and unambiguously that it can almost be tasted and smelled". Seems rather a marvellous thing to me, and better than reading a dry old textbook.
Some of our best novelists - Beryl Bainbridge, Penelope Fitzgerald - have been turning to the past, transporting us to turn-of-the-century Russia, or the Crimean War; we've learnt, while being entertained. I had written 12 contemporary novels before leaving Tescos and traffic jams behind and plunging into the past - in my case, 17th-century Holland. What fascinated me was showing that human emotions never change; greed, lust, betrayal - same feelings, different costumes. And yet how those emotions are coloured by profoundly different expectations of marriage, mortality and the fear of an all-seeing, punishing God. To bring these contradictions to life is a great adventure for a novelist and for the reader.
We're not escaping when we read about the past. We're discovering. A civilised society is one that draws and learns from history. There are plenty of contemporary novels around. My moan would be that there are too many stories about, as Natasha describes it, "the struggles that are still going on in women's lives". And, with all this rich choice on offer, who is finding the time to read them all?
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments