PROMS / St Petersburg Philharmonic: Royal Albert Hall / Radio 3

Stephen Johnson
Wednesday 26 August 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The St Petersburg Philharmonic radically reshaped its layout for its Prom on Tuesday - with cellos centre left, violins either side, and string basses and brass- percussion rising like wings to left and right. From the back of the stalls it was hard to tell whether this made a great deal of difference. It wasn't, however, minute refinements of sound that we'd come to hear, but that pulse-quickening melodic sweep and rhythmic drive which - rightly or wrongly - we still associate with the Petersburg / Leningrad tradition.

There was no lack of surging feeling and long-breathed eloquence in Rachmaninov's Second Piano Concerto, and soloist Mikhail Rudy was well matched to the orchestra in spirit. If his piano had been as well matched in pitch, it might have been glorious, but alas, clashes of tuning spoiled passage after passage. Shostakovich's Fifth Symphony, however, was gremlin- free. Mariss Jansons's pacy opening, his sudden gear-changes and free attitude to dynamics (notably at the first big climax of the Largo) weren't for purists, and the urgency and dark, private intensity were of a kind that European and American conductors often miss. As for the 'Is the end tragic or triumphant?' question . . . No obvious partisanship here - it was simply magnificent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in