NET GAINS: Making the most of a cat scan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.www.cat-scan.com
Congratulations to Kyle, winner of the Internet's first Cat Scan contest. The rules were simple: entrants must place their moggies on a flatbed scanner and email the results. The winner managed to get two moggies onto the scanner, and in case you're worried, the site's owner assures us that entries will be disqualified "if the cat looks like it is in serious pain. If you have to hurt the cat to scan it, your entry will not be allowed," he says. "I love cats, I just believe that a scanned cat is hilarious." He also includes a picture of his own rather satisfied looking cat sitting happily atop a scanner, just to prove you don't have to scar your cat psychologically in order to get that picture.
The winner was decided on the basis of five criteria:
* Style: Does the cat's hair make an interesting pattern?
* Cat beauty: Is this an attractive feline, or a fat, dirty old bag of fleas?
* Form: Does the cat's squashed body look like a pear, or a pile of dough?
* Positioning: Can you see the cat's face or paws?
* Consistency: Did the cat squirm much? Full-body scans have a better chance of victory.
Clinton's sexual scandal rebutted
www.whitehouse.gov
US President Bill Clinton's web page does not dodge the issue. It includes transcripts of all the President's recent speeches and his office's official rebuttal of the Kenneth Starr report. Whether anyone ploughs through these documents is anybody's guess, but at least it leaves the democratic decision up to the individual.
I had a grudging hope last weekend that the release of the Kenneth Starr report on US President Bill Clinton would push the Internet to total collapse. The sites - which were due to place the report online - were unaccessable for hours before the report was issued. If anybody, like me, tried to log onto Congress's website over the evening of the 11 September, you would have found it impossible.
Everybody was having the same problem, it seemed. At 7.30pm - half an hour after the report was released - the report had not been posted on CNN's website, although it was promising it as soon as possible.
The entire event proved an interesting insight into the world wide web's cruel limitations. It may be excellent for bypassing the usual controlled channels of communication, but when its big day came for disseminating a lot of information very quickly to a lot of people it proved to be hopelessly inadequate for the job.
A Starr report
www.cnn.com
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments