London Sinfonietta/Valade, Queen Elizabeth Hall, London <!-- none onestar twostar threestar fourstar fivestar -->

Bayan Northcott
Wednesday 26 April 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Take an ensemble of 31 players, seat them in sections separated by glass panels, mic up each player to a mixing desk, combine their sound with electronically generated sine tones, feed the resulting sound complexes through ring modulators and project them from loudspeakers, and you get the extraordinary sonorities of Mixtur by Karlheinz Stockhausen.

The electronic component of this pioneering effort in "real-time" sound transformation may now be neatly computerised, compared with the primitive means of 1964, when Stockhausen conceived the score. But the piece remains expensive to mount, retaining its reputation for technological gee-whizzery. No wonder the box office for this performance by the London Sinfonietta was besieged by readers of Time Out and The Wire.

In fact, the half-hour sequence comprising Mixtur was heard twice, as Stockhausen now likes it to be. The work also epitomises his preoccupation in the 1960s with what he called "moment-form" - the conceiving of scores as collections of self-contained units that could be shuffled into various successions. Here, Pierre-André Valade directed clear-cut readings of the score first in reverse order of Stockhausen's 1967 published version, then forwards. It seemed that the electronic modulation was more fiercely applied by Ian Dearden and David Sheppard of Sound Intermedia second time round.

Did one version seem more meaningful? Not really. The sounds are rarely less than arresting in their edginess or fuzz - as of a not-quite-tuned radio or chalk squeaking on a blackboard. And Stockhausen's gifts for textural layering and sudden dramatic gestures are everywhere in evidence. Yet there remains a curiously equivocal feeling in hearing instrumentalists capable of precisest nuances used to an essentially cruder end: the sense of a potentially focused composition reduced to a mere montage sonore.

As so often with Stockhausen, one felt the tragedy of a marvellously speculative and inventive mind, not quite musical enough to make the best of the sonorous means it has dreamt up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in