replay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tchaikovsky: Piano Concerto No 1
Rachmaninov: Piano Concerto No 3
Martha Argerich (piano)
Bavarian RSO / Kirill Kondrashin
RSO Berlin / Riccardo Chailly
(Recorded 1980 and 1982)
(Philips 446 673-2)
Argerich and Kondrashin skateboard through Tchaikovsky's First Piano Concerto as if there were no tomorrow, each goading the other with dramatic varieties of executive dynamism. And yet there's tenderness to spare, especially in the main body of the first movement and the Andantino simplice's outer sections. The cadenza, though, is manic and the prestissimo section of the second movement, astonishingly fleet-fingered. It's a lean, hot-blooded and intuitively well-aimed performance, whereas the Rachmaninov Third - a long-awaited first release - raises a storm but misses its mark.
True, Argerich projects "that inimitable touch of wildness" (to quote Bryce Morrison's eloquent booklet notes), but too often she seems fazed by the denseness of the writing, dazzling us with hectic note-flurries while failing to focus their musical shape. A shame, because Riccardo Chailly lends a particularly sensitive accompaniment, especially in the Adagio's introduction and the shimmering string passage that leads into the cadenza. However, Argerich herself appears either restless or over- zealous, rather like a newly-won religious convert whose "passion" is more a well-intentioned affectation than a symptom of true faith. Colour is legion and keyboard rage the order of the day, but excitability yields diminishing returns - and this is definitely a short-term thrill.
Elgar: Cello Concerto; Cockaigne; Wand of Youth (Suites Nos 1 & 2); Elegy
Anthony Pini (cello)
London Philharmonic / Eduard van Beinum
(Recorded: 1949-1950)
(Beulah 2PD15) A minute or so spent in the company of Eduard van Beinum's Cockaigne is enough to lift anyone's spirits. The pace is so fast, the playing full of newsreel-style excitement and the conducting as characterful as Beecham's and as bracing as Elgar's own. Just listen to the crisply articulated woodwinds, the sharp-edged attack of the brass or the wistful but never cloying strings.
Van Beinum was the Concertgebouw's most distinguished regular maestro after Mengelberg and before Haitink: a compassionate disciplinarian who could scale Brucknerian heights or bring sunlight to Mendelssohn and Schubert. He even spent two seasons with the LPO, and when you consider that this was by no means the orchestra's best period, his achievement here seems doubly remarkable.
Anthony Pini's account of the Cello Concerto has dignity, strength and natural reserve: the first movement is outgoing and proud; the Scherzo vigorous, if fairly bland; the Adagio quietly confessional; and the finale, with its sudden rushes of melancholy, eloquent beyond words. As to the Wand of Youth, both suites are superbly done and there's some breathtaking virtuosity in "The Wild Bears". The recordings (some from original tapes, others from shellac pressings) are variable. But, that apart, this is an absolute winner.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments