Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Watchdog condemns rocker for a face that doesn't fit

Chris Gray
Tuesday 15 January 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A rock singer hailed as the "saviour of music" has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority for having a face that is "gratuitously distressing" and likely to upset children.

The watchdog condemned Andrew WK as the unacceptable face of rock after receiving two complaints about adverts for his debut album, I Get Wet, released last November. It was voted number nine in the music magazine NME's top 50 albums of the year.

The album cover shows a close-up of the lank-haired American singer's face, with blood running from his nose, down his chin and on to his neck. The album, which features songs with names such as "Party Til You Puke" and "It's Time to Party", has been taken seriously by the music press, andNME proclaimed him the "saviour of music".

Its cover was reproduced in poster advertisements by his London record company, Mercury Records. It provoked complaints because the image suggested the singer had been taking cocaine, and because it could frighten "children and vulnerable people".

The authority accepted Mercury Records' argument that the nosebleed was not associated with taking cocaine but it upheld the complaints, ruling: "Because of its graphic nature and implication of violence, the image was gratuitously distressing and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, especially because it ... would be seen by children."

Mercury Records has been ordered not to use the image in paid-for advertisements.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in