Taylor Swift reveals why she quit Spotify: 'I will not dedicate my life's work to an experiment'
The 1989 star decided to 'change the way she was doing things' with her music
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Taylor Swift has defended her decision to withdraw her music from Spotify because she does not think artists are treated fairly.
The "Shake It Off" singer, whose new album 1989 is proving a huge hit worldwide, has removed all her previous releases from the streaming service despite them begging her to reconsider.
"Music is changing so quickly and the landscape of the music industry itself is changing so quickly, that everything new, like Spotify, all feels to me a bit like a grand experiment," she told Yahoo, adding that she does not believe music is valueless and should be free.
"I'm not willing to contribute my life's work to an experiment that I don't feel fairly compensates the writers, producers, artists and creators of this music."
Swift insists she is "really open-minded" and wants to be "a part of progress", but thinks Spotify is "taking the word 'music' out of the music industry".
"I felt like I was saying to my fans, 'If you create music someday, if you create a painting someday, someone can just walk into a museum, take it off the wall, rip off a corner off it and it's theirs now and they don't have to pay for it," she said.
"I didn't like the perception that it was putting forth and so I decided to change the way I was doing things."
Spotify, however, argues that fans "should be able to listen to music wherever and whenever they want".
The company published a long blog post aimed at tempting Swift back. "Artists have an absolute right to be paid for their work and protected from piracy," it read. "That's why we pay nearly 70 per cent of our revenue back to the music community."
She has also been rumoured for a Glastonbury headline slot after the festival's founder Michael Eavis reportedly expressed interest in booking her.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments