Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Rubbish gig in Finland? You can now ask for your money back

Concerts that fall 'well below reasonably expected standards' can be refunded

Jess Denham
Tuesday 07 July 2015 10:59 EDT
Comments
Hands up who wants a refund?
Hands up who wants a refund? (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gig-goers in Finland can now get a 50 per cent refund if a live music performance is disappointing, thanks to a new law.

The country's groundbreaking decision was made after a fan demanded his money back following a Chuck Berry concert in Helsinki in 2013, arguing that the rock'n'roll pioneer "seemed fatigued". The singer was clearly unwell and later apologised.

After a review, Finland's Consumer Disputes Board ruled last Friday that ticket-holders can request refunds if a show is "well below reasonably expected standards".

Board chairman Pauli Stahlberg made it clear that subjective opinion will not be enough and that a gig will have to be considered bad by the majority of attendees. Otherwise, things could get messy quickly.

"What is significant is a generally agreed view that the concert was a failure, as it was in the Chuck Berry case," he told Finnish broadcaster Yle, adding that the most important factor is whether it "meets the consumer's expectations".

Chuck Berry collapsed on stage due to ill health in 2013
Chuck Berry collapsed on stage due to ill health in 2013

Stahlberg said that intoxication as well as illness could also be a cause for a refund, but was careful to point out that it "doesn't necessarily affect the quality of their performances".

Music festivals will be an exception as a vast range of acts contribute to the ticket price and enforcing the law would be too difficult.

"There are numerous different performers at a festival and so it has to be evaluated as a whole," Stahlberg added. "Even the marching order affects perception of the overall quality. A failed performance by a featured star is a bigger deal for consumers than one by a warm-up band."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in