R Kelly jury begins deliberations in racketeering and sex trafficking trial
Defence and prosecution have both delivered their closing arguments
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A jury has started deliberating in R Kelly’s federal trial.
The jury of seven men and five women began deliberating on Friday on racketeering and sex trafficking charges faced by the singer.
His defence attorneys and the prosecution both delivered their closing arguments this week.
Kelly’s trial began on 18 August and included testimony from witnesses who alleged that Kelly subjected them to perverse and sadistic whims when they were underage.
Kelly has denied any wrongdoing and pleaded not guilty to the charges.
He was charged in July 2019 with racketeering predicated on criminal conduct including sexual exploitation of children, kidnapping, forced labor and Mann Act violations involving the coercion and transportation of women and girls in interstate commerce to engage in illegal sexual activity.
Kelly was also charged with four counts of violating the Mann Act related to his interstate transportation of a victim to New York to engage in illegal sexual activity, and his exposure of her to an infectious venereal disease without her knowledge.
Kelly “believed the music, the fame, and the celebrity meant he could do whatever he wanted,” Assistant US Attorney Nadia Shihata said in federal court in Brooklyn in a fiery rebuttal to the defence's closing argument that portrayed Kelly as a victim of false accusations.
But, she added, “He’s not a genius, he’s a criminal. A predator.” She added that his alleged victims “aren’t groupies or gold diggers. They're human beings.”
In his closing, defence attorney Deveraux Cannick told the jury that testimony by several accusers was full of lies, and that “the government let them lie.”
After Shihata finished, US District Judge Ann Donnelly started her final instructions for jurors, who later began deliberating.
The Associated Press contributed to this report