Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pitbull and Ke$ha in multi-million dollar Timber lawsuit over 'identical' harmonica riff from the 70s

Original songwriters' claim not to have seen a penny from record sales

Christopher Hooton
Wednesday 25 June 2014 10:51 EDT
Comments
Timber's music video has been watched over 306 million times on YouTube
Timber's music video has been watched over 306 million times on YouTube (Vevo)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A copyright infringement battle of Coldplay vs Joe Satriani proportions is brewing over Pitbull and Ke$ha's dancefloor-obliterating hit Timber, which features a harmonica melody which Lee Oskar claims is "identical" in sound to that of his 1978 song San Francisco Bay.

Songwriters Lee Oskar, Keri Oskar and Greg Errico are seeking $3 million in damages over the track, which topped charts around the world.

The trio claim that Timber's harmonica player Paul Harrington was instructed to "emulate" the intro to their song to give it "an identical texture and sound".

Here are the two sections in question:

[0:00 - 0:05]

[0:24 - 0:30]

Very often in these cases defendants will argue that similarities are coincidental or just not that strong, but in this instance the riffs are so similar that it is probably a rights issue.

Oskar, Oskar and Errico allege that Pitbull's label Sony "might have obtained a license" to use their song from a license holder, but insist that it did not have the permission from the actual songwriters.

The trio say they have not received any money from Timber, which has shifted 4,000,000 copies in the US.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in