Franz Ferdinand respond to their band trending because of Soleimani killing: 'For the record, we think #WWIII is a bad idea'
Band is named after Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, whose killing precipitated the First World War
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Franz Ferdinand have reacted to the killing of Iranian general Qassem Soleimani after the band’s name started trending in relation to the slaying.
The Scottish rock band is named after the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, whose assassination in 1914 precipitated the First World War.
Some drew comparisons between the two killings, predicting that Soleimani’s death could trigger a major conflict.
Frontman Alex Kapranos reacted in a tweet, writing: ”This is not how I wanted to see the name of my band trending on Twitter #FranzFerdinand”
The band’s account itself also shared an ominous message that read: ”For the record, we think #WWIII is a bad idea.”
Soleimani was one of Iran’s top generals. His killing in a US airstrike, which was first reported on Thursday, has sent shockwaves across the Middle East, with Iran and its allies vowing revenge amid fears of an all-out war.
It remains unclear what the consequences of his slaying will be.
While they have vast arsenals and are within striking distance of US troops deployed in Syria, Iraq and the Gulf, Iran’s leaders may be wary of launching a retaliatory attack that could ignite a major conflict.
Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, which formulates the country’s military and nuclear strategy, says it has reached a decision on how to respond to the killing – but isn’t saying what the decision is.
The council’s brief statement after a special session on Friday says it investigated “the different aspects of this incident and it is announcing that the United States of America is responsible for all consequences of this criminal adventure”.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments