Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Busted members lose claim for £10m in unpaid royalties

Stephen Howard
Friday 06 June 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two original members of the boy band Busted have lost their claim that they were owed about £10m in unpaid royalties in a High Court case costing £1.7m.

Both Ki McPhail and Owen Doyle, who were criticised by the judge as "unreliable" witnesses, had their assets frozen before further hearings to decide who will bear the cost of the 19-day trial.

The pair claimed they wrote songs with James Bourne and Matt Willis – including the hits "Year 3000" and "What I Go To School For" – when the group formed in 2001. They told the judge they were forced to sign away their rights after "threats" and "undue pressure" when they were sacked from the band later that year.

But Mr Justice Morgan said in his ruling: "Ki was not a reliable and convincing witness. He quite plainly exaggerated and distorted the real event."

The judge said that Doyle "was not a reliable witness either. He manifested a high degree of confusion and a failure to grasp the detail in relation to many of the significant events."

Lawyers for the claimants said they might appeal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in