Did Jay Z and Timbaland steal this hook? Hip hop duo sued over 'Big Pimpin'

Charlie Atkin
Wednesday 14 October 2015 10:50 EDT
Comments
Jay Z Copyright Lawsuit

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Attorneys for Jay Z have claimed the rapper properly acquired the rights to an Egyptian musician's melody to use for his hit 1999 song Big Pimpin', as a trial in a longstanding copyright lawsuit got underway.

Jay Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, and hip hop producer Timothy "Timbaland" Mosley are among the defendants named in a 2007 complaint by the nephew of late Egyptian songwriter Baligh Hamdy, who alleged that the rapper had used his uncle's composition without permission.

(Getty)

Jay Z, wearing a navy suit and tie, sat between his lawyers at the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles as he silently observed the afternoon's proceedings. He told Reuters he had no comment on the case.

He is scheduled to testify on Wednesday.

Jay Z's lawyer Andrew Bart argued Tuesday that the explicit lyrics of "Big Pimpin'" should not be discussed in relation to the lawsuit, as a depiction of the words as "vulgar" and "disgusting" could prejudice the jury against Jay Z.

Jay Z leaves court

U.S. District Court Judge Christina Snyder ruled in his favor, saying examining Jay Z's lyrics would be irrelevant in this case.

Attorney Peter Ross, representing Hamdy's nephew Osama Ahmed Fahmy, told the eight-member jury that Jay Z and his producers had purposefully avoided asking permission to use Hamdy's track because they allegedly knew it wouldn't be granted given the risque lyrics.

"You have to go to the composer himself, or his heirs, play the work, and get his approval," Ross said. "That, he never did."

The lawsuit follows another high-profile musical copyright case. In March, the heirs of late soul singer Marvin Gaye successfully sued artists Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for $7.4 million for plagiarizing Gaye in their hit "Blurred Lines."

Attorney Christine Lepera, representing Timbaland and other defendants, told the jury that Fahmy's suit is an "effort to get an undeserved income."

Released in 1999, "Big Pimpin'" was a breakout hit for Jay Z. Forbes estimated his wealth at $520 million in 2014.

Lepera said Timbaland used Hamdy's 1957 Egyptian tune "Khosara, Khosara" as a chorus loop for "Big Pimpin'" without realizing it was owned by EMI Music Arabia. The producers later paid $100,000 to EMI Music Arabia to acquire the license.

But Fahmy has argued in court documents that the payment is inconsequential, and that only Hamdy's heirs have the right to approve a derivative work of the late musician's composition.

Reporting by Agencies

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in